Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem with "blfchk" on Ubuntu 20.04 #139

Open
Napulsnik opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Problem with "blfchk" on Ubuntu 20.04 #139

Napulsnik opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@Napulsnik
Copy link

Hello. For some reason, "blfchk" does not work in the new version of the brainflayer for Ubuntu 20.04.
I have Ubuntu 20.04 and the latest brainflayer version.
Example:
./brainflayer/blfchk bloom.blf hash160
or
cat hash160 | ./brainflayer/blfchk bloom.blf
Nothing happens.
If you install Ubuntu 16 and the previous version of brainflayer then blfchk works fine.

@Mazahaka18
Copy link

Mazahaka18 commented Feb 9, 2021

Hello. My situation is exactly the same I used the following Ubuntu versions: 20.04.2, 18.04.5, 16.04.7, 12.04.5
Example:
./brainflayer/blfchk bloom.blf hash160
Nothing happens
I install Ubuntu 12 and 16 version but blfchk does not work.
Ryancdotorg, can you help us? @ryancdotorg

@ryancdotorg
Copy link
Owner

I'll take a look at it this weekend.

@Mazahaka18 It doesn't do anything unless you provide input, and even then it'll only give output if there are matches.

@Mazahaka18
Copy link

I'll take a look at it this weekend.

@Mazahaka18 It doesn't do anything unless you provide input, and even then it'll only give output if there are matches.

Thank you! We will wait for the results. I specially added two lines manually one in the bloom file the second in hash160 the first line. There are no results in the terminal or new files - just a blinking cursor and no activity in the system monitor.

@ryancdotorg
Copy link
Owner

If I have time, I'm just going to integrate the new bloom filter code I wrote a while back that handles large numbers of addresses with minimal false positives and is a lot faster if only looking at a few addresses.

@Mazahaka18
Copy link

We look forward to it. Thank you for the app and for supporting it for such a long time. From Russia with love!

@Mazahaka18
Copy link

Mazahaka18 commented Feb 15, 2021

@ryancdotorg Hello. What's up with blfchk, as i understand it there was no time...

@wgxli wgxli mentioned this issue Feb 26, 2021
@tukaanimhaka
Copy link

tukaanimhaka commented May 13, 2024

Noticed that if you pass the hash160 file used to generate the bloom filter no output results. Shouldnt blfchk be able to find the hash which was used to create the bloom filter? What is the purpose of blfchk?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants