Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review free flow speeds #91

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 17, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Review free flow speeds #91

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 17, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Currently, free-flow speeds in Dynameq are set to speed in planning network + 5 
mph.  The issue here is to look at how free-flow speeds are set in the current 
planning network and determine if we are happy with that.

It used to be that the free-flow speeds in the network were too fast for a 
static model, so instead there was a factor in front of the VDF that was a 
function of facility type and increased the free-flow travel time by some 
constant ratio in order to match the observed travel times better.  This was 
ugly, and there was talk of stripping it out.  The question is:  what are we 
left with for free-flow speeds?  If it is something like a posted speed, that 
is probably pretty close to what we want.  If the free-flow speeds are reduced 
in the static model to account for stop-sign delay in uncongested conditions, 
then we probably need to speed them up more for the DTA.  

Original issue reported on code.google.com by greg.erh...@ucl.ac.uk on 12 Jun 2012 at 5:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by elizab...@sfcta.org on 22 Aug 2012 at 12:47

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by elizab...@sfcta.org on 26 Sep 2012 at 6:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by dan.tisc...@sfcta.org on 27 Dec 2012 at 1:03

  • Changed state: On-Hold

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant