Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Observing high response times compared to what we see in waterfall graph #4229

Open
sweety-18 opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@sweety-18
Copy link

sweety-18 commented Jul 16, 2024

Your question

I executed sitespeed scripts for a webpage to capture the loading time. I observed the fully loaded time as 5 seconds, whereas when I checked the waterfall graph, none of the requests took more than 1 second, and the entire loading completed within 1 second.

Can you please let me know why it is showing extra time even though the waterfall shows that the page loading happened within 1 second?

Screenshot 2024-07-16 at 1 23 23 PM Screenshot 2024-07-16 at 1 23 36 PM Screenshot 2024-07-16 at 1 28 13 PM
@soulgalore
Copy link
Member

It's hard to say since I don't know how you run the test. Here's some guidance on how to write a bug report so I can act on it: https://www.sitespeed.io/documentation/sitespeed.io/bug-report/

It looks like the request happen but there's 127 seconds before the domContentLoaded time happens. That metrics is the time the browser takes to parse the document and execute deferred and parser-inserted scripts including the network time from the users location.

I would try to launch the same test in another browser and see if you get the same behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants