1. The original plan is to have no donations specifically to a centralized WW nonprofit;
2. Rather, learners/beneficiaries can directly support contributors as they're featured;
3. Distributions can be agreed upon and shared based on GitHub/DUNA commits.

One of John's ongoing developments is uncovering how to efficiently allocate capital to a decentralized group. Here's a note from him:¹

Every day, I come across new online exchanges promising seamless service for the simple capitalistic necessity of providing a market for digital assets. The function of an exchange is so deep-rooted in society, that I just can't wrap my head around why it's not done through a nonprofit protocol. Along those lines, I think a similar argument exists for education itself.

Education is the core of any productive human. How else can you build something iterating on the ideas of at least hundreds of people who often lived before you where even born? That's the miracle or self-directed learning, which I believe we can drastically amplify using community.

Along those lines, do you think it's worth having a space to focus exclusively on quality free financial education? What's at stake here is the future of education. Space stations won't have centralized college. Might we best support innovation with a more decentralized intelligence tool?

🤝📈📖