Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing Features in New Spectrogram #82

Open
nabobalis opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Missing Features in New Spectrogram #82

nabobalis opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@nabobalis
Copy link
Contributor

nabobalis commented Nov 11, 2022

Describe the feature

The old Spectrogram had:

  • subtract_bg
  • randomized_auto_const_bg
  • auto_const_bg
  • in_interval
  • join_many
  • time_to_x
  • rescale
  • flatten
  • check_linearity

Proposed solution

Do we add them?
Do we still need them?

@kenfus
Copy link

kenfus commented Nov 17, 2022

Hello! I am part of the e-CALLISTO team at FHNW. We store, process and provide the data. We are planning a new version of it, for which we want to add part of the logic for the creation and manipulation of spectrograms to radiospectra.

As for the features, we currently use the following:

  • auto_const_bg
  • join_many
  • rescale

At FHNW, we created functions enhancing subtract_bg and we would add them to the Spectogram class later on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants