Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for original dataset #18

Open
masashitsubaki opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Request for original dataset #18

masashitsubaki opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@masashitsubaki
Copy link

I visited the web site of Alchemy but could not download the original dataset as described in this issue #17.

Actually, I have emailed to Dr. Guangyong (one of the paper's authors) and received that
``the order in CSV file is randomly permuted and the data (each molecular property) is normalized for the contest.''
So I would like to use the original data like the format of the QM9 dataset,
that is, the xyz coordinates, property values, and their units (e.g., eV and eV/atom) that are not normalized.

@peiguo-scut
Copy link

Thanks for your interests in our work, you can download our original dataset in the format of the QM9 from our official link https://alchemy.tencent.com/data/alchemy-v20191129.zip

Best Regards
Guangyong

@masashitsubaki
Copy link
Author

masashitsubaki commented May 28, 2021

Thank you very much for providing the dataset and now I could download it.
I have a question about the energy value in the Alchemy dataset.

In the QM9 dataset, almost all of the studies transform the internal energy (original provided value) into the atomization energy, learn the atomization energy, and evaluate its prediction performance (chemical accuracy is 1.0 kcal/mol) in their papers. This transformation is done by using the atomref information in the QM9 repository.
https://github.com/masashitsubaki/QuantumDeepField_molecule#datasets

Could you provide the atomref information used in the Alchemy? Or did the Alchemy contest use the internal energy directly instead of the atomization energy?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants