Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--oems-substres-div also changes air mesh? #24

Open
dom11990 opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

--oems-substres-div also changes air mesh? #24

dom11990 opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dom11990
Copy link

I was under the impression that this should only mesh the substrate material but it also appears to affect the air cell size. I think it would be worth separating these two.

@thomaslepoix
Copy link
Owner

Yes substrate resolution is actually used to mesh all non metallic materials, I is the case in most OpenEMS tutorials but you're right it may worth it so speed up simulation when there is no far field calculation.

As an other option, I thought about a script flag to reduce the simulation box (and so disable NF2FF).

What is your point about that?

@dom11990
Copy link
Author

Yeah I think a scaling of the simulation box would be a good addition.

@dom11990
Copy link
Author

The reason I opened this issue was because I was simulating a very thin substrate (200um) and because you want to have several mesh lines in there, you can imagine how long the simulation would take when the entire simulation box got that same resolution. Really the critical item was the mesh in the height dimension of the substrate. Perhaps we need to make this finer or configurable explicitly?

@thomaslepoix thomaslepoix added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 12, 2020
@thomaslepoix
Copy link
Owner

Oh okay! But there is no need to care about the Z axis mesh, it is always meshed with 1 line in the metals and 2 in the substrate.

This way with metal boxes :
image

And this way with conducting sheets :
image

@dom11990
Copy link
Author

Is that sufficient? I had pretty significant differences in my simulation when I increased the density in Z..

@thomaslepoix
Copy link
Owner

I don't know, trying with like 2 or 6, results were slightly different but difficult to say wich one was better. Thorsten usually uses 4 or 5 lines in the examples.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants