Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Prokaryotic Genomes #139

Open
Faitero opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Support Prokaryotic Genomes #139

Faitero opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Faitero
Copy link
Collaborator

Faitero commented May 15, 2017

Recently bacterial labs have started to perform iCLIP and our lab is planning to perform experiments on some bacterial strains. It will be a big enhance to support all of this community with a tool available for them.

@JureZmrzlikar
Copy link
Contributor

This might be a stupid question, but... What modifications need to be done to support this?

@Faitero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Faitero commented May 15, 2017

Well, I'm not sure. I know that we can directly download lots of Eukaryotic genomes but none Prokaryotic. I assume that we could feed the pipeline with a custom bacterial gft file, although I'm not sure on the Genialis visual version. Bacterial labs cannot afford a full-time bioinformatician and probably prone to buy your product.
The bacterial annotation has a single chromosome and usually several plasmids. In the other hand doesn't have introns or specify 5'- 3' UTRs. Genes usually appear as long chains of coding sequences that in occasions overlap to each other on the same or different strand. Therefore, I suppose that we couldn't use segment command either RNA maps, but wonder how it will deal with this really different annotation format...

@JureZmrzlikar
Copy link
Contributor

OK, this seems like a big feature to me. It would make sense to schedule a dedicated meeting to discuss expected outcome vs. current state. Then we can decide how to approach this task and plan technical details.

@Faitero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Faitero commented May 16, 2017

No worries!! I was thinking out loud and I wrote it here... :) I believe there are more relevant things to work in. I'll give it a try as it is and we can discuss it in the future. Thanks!!

@JureZmrzlikar
Copy link
Contributor

OK. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants