Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No operators in feed issue: improve descriptive text #1132

Open
irees opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

No operators in feed issue: improve descriptive text #1132

irees opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@irees
Copy link
Member

irees commented Jul 13, 2017

No description provided.

@stevevance
Copy link

After Ian's redesign it looks like this (without any line breaks):

No Agency in the GTFS Feed had a matching Transitland Operator Agencies in GTFS Feed: : Jet Existing Feed agency_id <-> Transitland Operator associations: : o-9yreb-jet

screenshot 2017-08-08 16 51 14

What I would like to see changed

  1. The quantity of agencies in the GTFS feed, printed after "Agencies in GTFS Feed", like this: Agencies in GTFS Feed (1):.
  2. Listing the existing feed agency_id <-> Transitland Operator associations with numbers in an ordered list <ol> (not as important).
  3. Quoting the agency_id so I can see where it starts and stops (there was once a problem that an agency ID had whitespace at the end of it, but I couldn't see that without opening the agency.txt file).
  4. Fewer "why is this space and colon here?" whitespace and colons (although I presume having the line breaks appear will resolve this)
  5. A period after "had a matching Transitland Operator".

@stevevance
Copy link

The feed fetcher should also count the number of operators that it finds in the feed (each time it fetches) and compare this number to the operatorsInFeed length. If they're different, a feed issue should be created with the same Details as the above feed issue.

This way we can be alerted to potentially new operators in existing feeds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants