-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document pmpu
APIs as stabilised
#8112
Comments
@yonipeleg33, it's not experimental - the tag was left there and should have been removed earlier. |
You're probably right, I meant only in the documentation level - removing the "experimental" tag, and adding proper documentation, following up on @arielshaqed's comment: #8108 (comment) My intent with the original PR was fixing a technical "bug" in the documentation, but as it turned out, it is more big of a deal than I originally thought, so after discussing privately with @talSofer I decided to open a new issue for it and triage-ing it properly... |
@N-o-Z I have updated the title and description, lmk if that's any better |
Great! Thank you for clarifying |
@N-o-Z why was this experimental in the first place? What changed since then? Is there full support for all Cloud vendors? |
This is one method of development we practice. We release something as experimental and if useful and works well we remove the experimental tag. |
Following up on #8103, and the subsequent discussion in #8108 - it appears that the pmpu APIs are already stable, but still tagged as "experimental".
The correct way to resolve this is by removing the experimental tag and documenting them properly (in
docs/
).cc @talSofer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: