You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, I’d like to thank you for making this great software available to everyone!
I have a question about potentially using PeptideAtlas data for library generation versus the entire human FASTA.
For example, if I am working with extracellular vesicles from human plasma, is there any advantage to using their plasma_EV build (https://peptideatlas.org/builds/human/plasma_ev/)? If so, would I simply download the peptide sequences in FASTA format, generate the library, and then reannotate the predicted library using the UniProt human FASTA file?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi Vadim,
First of all, I’d like to thank you for making this great software available to everyone!
I have a question about potentially using PeptideAtlas data for library generation versus the entire human FASTA.
For example, if I am working with extracellular vesicles from human plasma, is there any advantage to using their plasma_EV build (https://peptideatlas.org/builds/human/plasma_ev/)? If so, would I simply download the peptide sequences in FASTA format, generate the library, and then reannotate the predicted library using the UniProt human FASTA file?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions