Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating a dm bon-wide reference list of terms used in vocabularies #19

Open
kmexter opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kmexter
Copy link
Contributor

kmexter commented Nov 10, 2022

This has probably been raised in arms or osd already, but we need this to be dm bon-wide: a vocabulary that allows us to harmonise how we write terms (both in terms of HowWe_write-them, and in terms of what they mean) that come into the different projects. Don't actually create a vocab from scratch, but select from existing and enhance when necessary. Create a CSV (for scientists to look at) and triples. We would map each new project onto this, and also map from DwC and MiXS etc onto this, so we can also use it when exporting data to OBIS/GBIF/ENA/..

@cedricdcc cedricdcc changed the title Creating a dm bon-wide vocabulary Creating a dm bon-wide reference list of terms used in vocabularies Nov 16, 2022
@marc-portier
Copy link
Member

this really is about making sure that our semantic-uplifting process is organized in a way that applying it to the dmbon applications becomes as easy as possible

It makes a lot of sense but is currently bit ahead of the curve

I think we first need to

  • organise our templates into ro-profiles
  • apply them to the repos that need them
  • have github actions pick up on their changes to do the semantic uplifting

and use that experience to further think about optimally organising the workflow to get that done

  • maybe by providing temoplate macro's
  • maybe by having reference lists of recurring patterns
  • ...

However assembling the list of recurring things and issues is already a smart thing to do --> @kmexter -- maybe assemble these in comments to this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants