Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Success Criterion 3.3.1 - Error Identification - Level A #44

Open
JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Success Criterion 3.3.1 - Error Identification - Level A #44

JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT)
Milestone

Comments

@JJdeGroot
Copy link
Member

WCAG2ICT guidance: https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict-22/#error-identification

Share your thoughts for applying to mobile apps as a comment below.

@JJdeGroot JJdeGroot added this to the Level A milestone Jul 17, 2024
@JJdeGroot JJdeGroot added the small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT) label Aug 7, 2024
@julianmka
Copy link
Contributor

Based on previous task force conversation, this SC can be applied to native mobile apps and mobile web with minimal or no deviation from WCAG2ICT.

Proposal

In MATF's first draft of guidance, this SC's section will read as:

This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.1.

Please indicate your agreement with a thumbs up emoji 👍, or if you disagree, use the thumbs down emoji 👎 and elaborate in comments.

@jamieherrera
Copy link

The Intent documentation does mention an error message could be in a dialog rather than on the same page as the error itself. I wonder if we should add a note that dialogs are common for native iOS and Android communication? My company had a conversation about whether dialogs were acceptable; people were getting snagged on the phrase "in text".

@julianmka
Copy link
Contributor

I think that would be a good note to add, @jamieherrera, with the caveat that there does need to be some kind of inline indication of the error as well.

The pattern I usually recommend for screens with multiple validated inputs is to throw an alert dialogue with a more general message about the error(s) and then use an inline message to give details for each input with an error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants