Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Success Criterion 3.3.3 - Error Suggestion - Level AA #57

Open
JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Success Criterion 3.3.3 - Error Suggestion - Level AA #57

JJdeGroot opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT)
Milestone

Comments

@JJdeGroot
Copy link
Member

WCAG2ICT guidance: https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict-22/#error-suggestion

Share your thoughts for applying to mobile apps as a comment below.

@JJdeGroot JJdeGroot added this to the Level AA milestone Jul 18, 2024
@JJdeGroot JJdeGroot added the small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT) label Aug 7, 2024
@julianmka
Copy link
Contributor

julianmka commented Sep 11, 2024

Based on previous task force conversation, this SC can be applied to native mobile apps and mobile web with minimal or no deviation from WCAG2ICT.

Proposal

In MATF's first draft of guidance, this SC's section will read as:

This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.3.

Please indicate your agreement with a thumbs up emoji 👍, or if you disagree, use the thumbs down emoji 👎 and elaborate in comments.

@jha11y
Copy link

jha11y commented Sep 18, 2024

@julianmka this is for 3.3.4 not 3.3.3

@julianmka
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @jha11y, edited my comment to reflect the correct language!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
small-variation Small variation in applying the Success Criterion compared to WCAG(2ICT)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants