You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both 0 20 004 and 0 20 005, Past Weather (1) and (2), include exactly the same content - in fact, there is only a single code table that is labelled "0 20 004/0 20 005"! It would be advantageous to maintain only one copy of the code table.
Question: what is the best way to achieve this; use a namespace-forward?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Specifying /bufr4/codeflag/0-20-005 as a namespace-forward with target /bufr4/codeflag/0-20-004 and code "200" doesn't quite work as the RDF subject of the triples returned (or rendered in HTML) refer to /bufr4/codeflag/0-20-004.
Perhaps the only alternative is to create a register /bufr4/codeflag/0-20-004+005?
The more I think about it, the simplest (and hence preferential) approach is to establish a single register with the identifier /bufr4/codeflag/0-20-004+005
Both 0 20 004 and 0 20 005, Past Weather (1) and (2), include exactly the same content - in fact, there is only a single code table that is labelled "0 20 004/0 20 005"! It would be advantageous to maintain only one copy of the code table.
Question: what is the best way to achieve this; use a namespace-forward?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: