Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Break the PETSc backend in two: petsc and petsc_blk for unblocked vs blocked matrices to simplify usage #27

Open
wrtobin opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Break the PETSc backend in two: petsc and petsc_blk for unblocked vs blocked matrices to simplify usage #27

wrtobin opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@wrtobin
Labels
enhancement New feature or request external package
Milestone
0.3

Comments

@wrtobin
Copy link
Owner

wrtobin commented May 14, 2018

taking both versions into account in all operations is possible but also introduces additional logic in the backend, so doing two versions is preferable.
@wrtobin wrtobin added enhancement New feature or request external package labels May 14, 2018
@wrtobin wrtobin added this to the 0.3 milestone May 14, 2018
@wrtobin wrtobin self-assigned this May 14, 2018
@jacobmerson
Copy link
Collaborator

see #67 for a description of how this api can be implemented

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wrtobin wrtobin

Labels
enhancement New feature or request external package
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jacobmerson @wrtobin