Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scope to support consensus connectivity heatmap #53

Open
ttj131 opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add scope to support consensus connectivity heatmap #53

ttj131 opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ttj131
Copy link

ttj131 commented Apr 29, 2024

Hi!

Great package and enjoy how well/fast the RcppML package performs!

I was just wondering if addition of a consensus map, similar to the ones implemented by brunet https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308531101, would be useful here!

Regards,

ttj131

@zdebruine
Copy link
Owner

It could be helpful, simply as a sanity check for whether your model is behaving properly. What I mean, is that factors should not be similar to one another -- the whole objective of NMF is to separate distinct signals, particularly if you apply some small amount of sparsifying regularization (such as L2).

If you want to find similar factors across equal rank models, use bipartite matching (Hungarian algorithm). RcppML::bipartiteMatch.

If you want to find similar factors across different models, that is where consensus maps would be most helpful.

Hope that helps, sorry for the delay!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants