Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUGFIX] fix link type detection by different sources #109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2018
Merged

Conversation

genofire
Copy link
Member

@genofire genofire commented Jan 3, 2018

Description

Motivation and Context

ffnord/mesh-announce#25

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have added also tests for my new code.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 3, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #109 into master will increase coverage by 8.98%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #109      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.48%   83.47%   +8.98%     
==========================================
  Files          41       37       -4     
  Lines        1305     1216      -89     
==========================================
+ Hits          972     1015      +43     
+ Misses        314      185     -129     
+ Partials       19       16       -3
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
output/meshviewer/graph.go 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
output/meshviewer-ffrgb/meshviewer.go 90.62% <60%> (-9.38%) ⬇️
output/all/filter.go 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
output/all/output.go
cmd/query.go
cmd/serve.go
cmd/import.go
database/all/connection.go
lib/jsontime/jsontime.go
lib/duration/duration.go
... and 11 more

@genofire genofire requested review from corny and removed request for corny January 3, 2018 14:54
@corny corny force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from c32510e to ddc64eb Compare January 6, 2018 14:11
@corny corny force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 83b5f9f to 59c46ba Compare January 13, 2018 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants