Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal for more generic output head format. #7

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Tilps
Copy link
Contributor

@Tilps Tilps commented Jan 11, 2019

No description provided.

@Tilps
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tilps commented Jan 11, 2019

Further ideas to consider before moving forward with this.

  1. Should NETWORK_SE_AND_EXTENSIBLE_OUTPUT_HEADS imply that filter size and disable_relu are always respected, rather than the comment of different defaults for residual stack vs output heads. I'm leaning towards yes.
  2. Should there be an optional 'mapping layer' at the end of the output message. It would be a message containing repeated int32 permutation = 1; Where -1 is to indicate inputs that are discarded and otherwise is the output index to forward to. It sounds good I think... I would assume the microseconds needed to do it in cpu are probably acceptable without needing to optimize too much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant