-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge master to v12.6.0 after the merge of 12.5.1 to master #28217
Conversation
Cherry-picks #28136 (1fd9510). Original PR description: ## **Description** Fixes an issue where token balance showed as 0 during send flow. This occurred when clicking the token in the token list, then clicking the send button from the token details page. When going send first and then picking a token, picking `decimals` was a number: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/95d32a68-1076-4050-b129-187672694794) But when going token first and then clicking send , `decimals` was a string and skipped calculating the balance. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99a8fcd4-bd29-4969-b98d-6639d50553ff) `calcTokenAmount` seems to work with either string or number, so changing logic from #27083 which introduced the number check [![Open in GitHub Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28136?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #28112 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Click on an erc20 token on the token list 2. Click the send button on the token details page 3. Choose a destination account 4. The balance under the asset picker should be accurate ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> [![Open in GitHub Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28151?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. Co-authored-by: Brian Bergeron <brian.e.bergeron@gmail.com>
Cherry-picks #28145 to v12.5.1, and brings #28177 into v12.5.1 as well. The latter originally targeted v12.6.0, but we need it for a hotfix ahead of that. The PR description for that was: ## **Description** Forcing resolutions to fix `yarn audit` warnings and more specifically this issue: - GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm I decided to be very explicit about the resolution itself based on the output of: ```console $ yarn why secp256k1 ├─ ethereum-cryptography@npm:0.1.3 │ └─ secp256k1@npm:4.0.4 (via npm:^4.0.1) │ ├─ ganache@npm:7.9.2 │ └─ secp256k1@npm:4.0.3 (via npm:4.0.3) │ ├─ ganache@patch:ganache@npm%3A7.9.2#~/.yarn/patches/ganache-npm-7.9.2-a70dc8da34.patch::version=7.9.2&hash=7d7c66 │ └─ secp256k1@npm:4.0.3 (via npm:4.0.3) │ ├─ gridplus-sdk@npm:2.5.1 │ └─ secp256k1@npm:4.0.2 (via npm:4.0.2) │ └─ hdkey@npm:2.1.0 └─ secp256k1@npm:4.0.4 (via npm:^4.0.0) ``` We could also have a more straightforward resolution like: ```json ... "resolutions": { ... "secp256k1": "4.0.4" } ... ``` But that could also catch version with different major. Let me know what would be the preferred solution here. [![Open in GitHub Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/28176?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm ## **Manual testing steps** N/A ## **Screenshots/Recordings** ### **Before** ### **After** ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Charly Chevalier <charly.chevalier@consensys.net> Co-authored-by: sahar-fehri <sahar.fehri@consensys.net>
This PR cherry-picks 2c86162#diff-63ab7391d870a62d8bcd3cc5d5371432068538deb98e5effcb899434ed8649bb --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matthew Walsh <matthew.walsh@consensys.net>
Version v12.5.1 RC
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ 🚮 Removed packages: npm/secp256k1@4.0.3 |
@metamaskbot update-policies |
Policies updated. 🧠 Learn how: https://lavamoat.github.io/guides/policy-diff/#what-to-look-for-when-reviewing-a-policy-diff |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, we could fix the data-deletion with separate cherry-pick PR.
No release label on PR. Adding release label release-12.6.0 on PR, as PR was added to branch 12.6.0 when release was cut. |
This PR syncs 12.6.0 with master following the merge of 12.5.1 to master