README: trim AutoQuantize Latest News entry to title only - #2301
Conversation
Signed-off-by: realAsma <akuriparambi@nvidia.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe AutoQuantize latest-news entry in ChangesDocumentation update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This is a localized documentation-only change with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 6✅ Passed checks (6 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.) Full details: Security Anti-PatternsExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only README.md, as shown by the committed diff. It adds no modelopt or examples Python changes, no dependency changes, and no security-sensitive code patterns. Therefore, none of the listed security failure conditions are introduced. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2301 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 79.05% 79.05%
=======================================
Files 525 525
Lines 61109 61109
=======================================
Hits 48311 48311
Misses 12798 12798
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
The Latest News entry added in #2291 was too verbose, so this reduces it to the title-only style used by the rest of the list.
Summary by CodeRabbit