Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jinja-lsp: init at 0.1.81 #341074

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

jinja-lsp: init at 0.1.81 #341074

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lytedev
Copy link
Contributor

@lytedev lytedev commented Sep 10, 2024

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Sorry I hugely goofed up the previous PR and alerted a bunch of folks and lost the previous review context 😢. #338003

pkgs/by-name/ji/jinja-lsp/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

cargoHash = "sha256-vMoDbUDImDp+DPjS0rfJD9hYUa79bKsDUyAhAZvEyxA=";

meta = with lib; {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
meta = with lib; {
meta = {

Comment on lines +22 to +23
license = licenses.mit;
maintainers = with maintainers; [ lytedev ];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
license = licenses.mit;
maintainers = with maintainers; [ lytedev ];
license = lib.licenses.mit;
maintainers = with lib.maintainers; [ lytedev ];

github = "lytedev";
githubId = 508402;
name = "Daniel Flanagan";
keys = [ { fingerprint = "823E B345 6C62 D193 8904 2027 5B20 20A0 F992 1EF4"; } ];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only needed if you sign your git commits.

Co-authored-by: Arne Keller <2012gdwu+github@posteo.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants