Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove softcore electrostatics entry #521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Aug 15, 2023

This is a source of much confusion, but as far as I can tell we don't softcore our electrostatics, nor do we have the ability to do so easily in OpenMM (at least there's no way to change the functional form for PME).

Developers certificate of origin

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.02% ⚠️

Comparison is base (e797d52) 92.07% compared to head (8dbc44a) 92.05%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #521      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.07%   92.05%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         113      113              
  Lines        6938     6926      -12     
==========================================
- Hits         6388     6376      -12     
  Misses        550      550              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
openfe/protocols/openmm_rfe/_rfe_utils/relative.py 82.84% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
openfe/protocols/openmm_rfe/equil_rfe_methods.py 94.02% <ø> (ø)
openfe/protocols/openmm_rfe/equil_rfe_settings.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
openfe/tests/protocols/test_rfe_tokenization.py 97.14% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines -177 to -181
self._softcore_electrostatics_alpha = softcore_electrostatics_alpha
self._check_bounds(softcore_electrostatics_alpha,
"softcore_electrostatics_alpha")
self._softcore_sigma_Q = softcore_sigma_Q
self._check_bounds(softcore_sigma_Q, "softcore_sigma_Q")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so these attributes were never used?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I can tell, I did some digging and there's no way to modulate the nonbondedforce either.

@richardjgowers richardjgowers enabled auto-merge (rebase) August 24, 2023 08:29
@richardjgowers richardjgowers merged commit b3c0e59 into main Aug 24, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@richardjgowers richardjgowers deleted the no_sc_electrostatics branch August 24, 2023 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants