-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change get_simsteps function to handle NVT equilibration in plain MD protocol #647
Conversation
Hello @hannahbaumann! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
Comment last updated at 2023-11-22 14:33:35 UTC |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #647 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.97% 90.97% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 127 127
Lines 8679 8675 -4
==========================================
- Hits 7896 7892 -4
Misses 783 783
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@hannahbaumann could you tick that box re: certifying contributions? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple of quick things to change, otherwise this looks good.
equil_steps, prod_steps = settings_validation.get_simsteps( | ||
equil_length=settings['simulation_settings'].equilibration_length, | ||
prod_length=settings['simulation_settings'].production_length, | ||
equil_steps = settings_validation.get_simsteps( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great, de-hardcoding re-usable methods is super useful!
Co-authored-by: Irfan Alibay <IAlibay@users.noreply.github.com>
@IAlibay : Addressed your comments! I realized that a lot of tests are failing in the plain MD PR because I had already changed the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
Developers certificate of origin