Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding LambdaSettings object for AFE #681

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hannahbaumann
Copy link
Contributor

Developers certificate of origin

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Jan 8, 2024

Hello @hannahbaumann! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 67:60: W291 trailing whitespace
Line 69:80: E501 line too long (82 > 79 characters)
Line 78:80: E501 line too long (83 > 79 characters)
Line 148:78: W291 trailing whitespace

Line 546:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters)
Line 547:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
Line 562:42: E741 ambiguous variable name 'l'

Line 39:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace
Line 40:74: W291 trailing whitespace

Line 62:9: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Line 65:9: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent

Line 50:80: E501 line too long (85 > 79 characters)

Comment last updated at 2024-02-01 17:40:36 UTC

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Jan 11, 2024

@dwhswenson we're not 100% sure how the settings docs is meant to work - do you have a better idea here? We can add the relevant autopydantic entry under docs, but it looks like AlchemicalSettings isn't behaving as expected even when there is such an entry.

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay : could you clarify on the settings docs issue? I don't see anything wrong.

This PR's docs build for AlchemicalSettings has no field for lambda_functions/lambda_windows, whereas they do exist in current stable docs. Isn't that the change you would expect?

You'll see that this PR's build doesn't have a link for LambdaSettings, but that should just require adding the .. autopydantic_model:: at docs/reference/api/openmm_rfe.rst, etc.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Jan 11, 2024

@IAlibay : could you clarify on the settings docs issue? I don't see anything wrong.

This PR's docs build for AlchemicalSettings has no field for lambda_functions/lambda_windows, whereas they do exist in current stable docs. Isn't that the change you would expect?

You'll see that this PR's build doesn't have a link for LambdaSettings, but that should just require adding the .. autopydantic_model:: at docs/reference/api/openmm_rfe.rst, etc.

Let's add it to our topics of discussion later today - there's a couple of things I'm not 100% sure but it'll be easier to go through in person.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Jan 11, 2024

Validators discussed at today's call:

  • naked charges
  • monotonically increasing values

(for AFE)

raise ValueError(errmsg)
return v

@validator('lambda_elec')
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There may be a better way to compare different list lengths here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann Jan 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This validator currently would lead to errors when changing the settings from the default settings (since when changing lambda_elec the list of lambda_vdw has still the old length and therefore would raise an error. One could move the validator into the protocol instead, or do you have other suggestions @richardjgowers ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah there might be a limit to what's possible in the @validator and instead you want a protocol function. The nice thing about these (when possible) is it fails fast & early.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved the check to the _get_lambda_schedule function, or would it be better to have a separate _validator function there?

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann linked an issue Jan 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Regarding our discussion on documentation yesterday, could you add autopydantic entries for LambdaSettings here https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/openfe/blob/main/docs/reference/api/openmm_rfe.rst and https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/openfe/blob/main/docs/reference/api/openmm_solvation_afe.rst please?

Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of things here; some docs and a couple of validation things. Otherwise this is looking good!

@@ -404,8 +404,9 @@ def _default_settings(cls):
solvent_system_settings=SystemSettings(),
vacuum_system_settings=SystemSettings(nonbonded_method='nocutoff'),
alchemical_settings=AlchemicalSettings(),
lambda_settings=LambdaSettings(),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be reasonable here to change the default to match what we usually run as a default when doing AHFEs, i.e. 14 windows?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes, had changed that in the other PR, but not here, added this now!

@@ -535,6 +588,9 @@ def _create(
)
self._validate_alchemical_components(alchem_comps)

# Validate the lambda schedule
self._validate_lambda_schedule(self.settings)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To improve method reproducibility, I would switch this to passing self.settings.lambda_settings instead. That way when we make derived classes we can import the staticmethod across to different places and not face typing errors because we're using different protocol settings.


Raises
------
ValueError
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also check that there are any non-zero restraints and raise a logger warning if there are (i.e. this protocol doesn't apply restraints, restraints won't be applied).

if v <= 0:
errmsg = ("Number of lambda steps must be positive ")
class LambdaSettings(SettingsBaseModel):
"""Settings for lambda schedule
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add more details about what the settings class does?

Defines lists of floats to control various aspects of the alchemical transformation.

Notes
--------
* In all cases a lambda value of 0 defines a fully interacting state A and a non-interacting state B, whilst a value of 1 defines a fully interacting state B and a non-interacting state A.
* ``lambda_elec``, `lambda_vdw``, and ``lambda_restraints`` must all be of the same length, defining all the windows of the transformation.

This describes the lambda schedule and the creation of the
hybrid system.
"""Settings for the lambda protocol
This describes the lambda schedule.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This describes the lambda schedule.
Lambda schedule settings.
Settings controlling the lambda schedule, these include the switching function type, and the number of windows.

Or something like that.

Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is amazing, thanks!

@richardjgowers richardjgowers changed the title [ WIP ] Adding LambdaSettings object for AFE Adding LambdaSettings object for AFE Feb 1, 2024
@richardjgowers richardjgowers merged commit c07a781 into main Feb 1, 2024
1 of 7 checks passed
@richardjgowers richardjgowers deleted the lambda_settings_afe branch February 1, 2024 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lambda schedule design
5 participants