Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drop the gui bus upload of resources #53

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Sep 18, 2024

get rid of CPU spikes, OOM errors, it was a bad approach we tried!

companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

docker note: bus client needs to be updated in all containers to work with this PR, otherwise GUI won't have access to the files. ~/.cache/ovos_gui needs to be a shared volume too

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Simplified README by reorganizing sections and adding a "Limitations" section to clarify GUI resource accessibility.
    • Updated protocol documentation to specify client responsibilities for unresolved GUI resources and improved JSON structure guidelines.
  • New Features

    • Introduced a centralized GUI_CACHE_PATH for managing cached GUI resources.
  • Improvements

    • Streamlined GUI file sharing and resource management processes.
    • Enhanced clarity in the get_uri method by removing unnecessary parameters and focusing on new resource resolution strategies.
    • Updated test cases for Namespace and GuiPage to reflect recent changes in handling page identifiers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed method references in tests to align with updated caching functionality.
  • Chores

    • Removed deprecated GUI file server functionality to simplify the codebase.
    • Deleted outdated test files related to the GUI file server and GuiPage class.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the reorganization and enhancement of documentation in the README.md, the introduction of a new constant for caching GUI data in ovos_gui/constants.py, and various modifications across the ovos_gui module to streamline GUI resource management. Deprecated methods for handling GUI pages and the GUI file server have been removed, and the logic for resource caching has been refined. Additionally, updates have been made to tests to reflect these structural changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Reorganized content; added "Limitations" section regarding GUI resource files and updated plugin documentation.
ovos_gui/bus.py Removed get_client_pages method; updated synchronize and send_gui_pages methods for streamlined URI handling.
ovos_gui/constants.py Introduced GUI_CACHE_PATH constant for defining GUI cache path.
ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py Deleted file containing HTTP server functionality for GUI resources.
ovos_gui/namespace.py Enhanced namespace handling; removed methods related to GUI file handling and updated page management logic.
ovos_gui/page.py Removed url and page_id attributes; refactored get_uri method to use GUI_CACHE_PATH.
protocol.md Updated GUI service protocol documentation to clarify client responsibilities for unresolved resources and modified JSON structures.
test/unittests/test_bus.py Added _get_client_pages method to TestGUIWebsocketHandler and updated related tests.
test/unittests/test_gui_file_server.py Removed entire file and its associated test class and methods.
test/unittests/test_namespace.py Updated test methods to reflect changes in page identifier handling and resource management.
test/unittests/test_page.py Removed entire file containing tests for the GuiPage class.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix:handle unloaded namespaces #51: Changes in ovos_gui/namespace.py in both PRs involve modifications to the Namespace class, indicating a focus on improving the handling of namespaces, which is relevant to the overall functionality of the GUI file server.

Suggested labels

fix

Suggested reviewers

  • j1nx

🐇 In the garden, changes bloom,
Removing clutter, making room.
Caching paths for GUI delight,
Simplified code, oh what a sight!
With tests adjusted, all is clear,
A hop of joy, we give a cheer! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f26f31 and 49947a2.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • README.md (0 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/constants.py (1 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py (0 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/namespace.py (7 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/page.py (2 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_namespace.py (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
  • README.md
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py
Additional context used
Ruff
ovos_gui/namespace.py

955-955: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

Additional comments not posted (14)
ovos_gui/constants.py (2)

1-1: LGTM!

The import statement is correctly formatted and the imported function is used to define the GUI_CACHE_PATH constant.


3-3: LGTM!

The GUI_CACHE_PATH constant is correctly defined using the get_xdg_cache_save_path function. The constant is named using the UPPER_CASE convention, which is a best practice for constants in Python. The constant is used to define the cache directory path for the ovos_gui application.

ovos_gui/page.py (4)

5-5: LGTM!

The import statement is correctly added.


48-50: LGTM!

The _gui_cache property is correctly defined and uses the appropriate variables to construct the cache path.


52-54: LGTM!

The res_namespace property correctly determines the namespace based on the page_id attribute.


56-76: LGTM!

The refactored get_uri method improves clarity and maintainability by:

  • Removing the server_url parameter and associated logic.
  • Utilizing the res_namespace property to determine the appropriate path construction.
  • Using the _gui_cache property for consistent cache path structure.
  • Including a logging statement for debugging purposes.
  • Maintaining the original error handling behavior.
test/unittests/test_namespace.py (1)

Line range hint 470-479: LGTM! The test aligns with the PR objective.

The changes in the test function test_upload_system_resources reflect the shift from uploading to caching system resources, which aligns with the PR objective of eliminating the GUI bus upload mechanism.

The test logic and assertions remain valid for verifying the caching behavior of the _cache_system_resources method.

ovos_gui/namespace.py (7)

Line range hint 48-58: LGTM!

The import statements are well-organized and the newly added imports seem relevant to the module.


449-452: LGTM!

The initialization of the GUI file server based on the configuration looks good. Using the GUI_CACHE_PATH as the root directory for serving files is a sensible approach.


704-707: LGTM!

Adding the check for active namespaces before processing the 'load_pages' request is a good defensive programming practice. The error logging will help in identifying and fixing issues related to unexpected states.


878-878: LGTM!

Including the framework key in the mycroft.gui.port message data is a good addition. It provides useful information about the GUI framework being used, which can be leveraged for framework-specific handling or optimizations.


927-930: LGTM!

Adding the check for active namespaces before processing the 'back' signal is a good defensive programming practice. The error logging will help in identifying and fixing issues related to unexpected states.


949-958: LGTM!

The renaming of the _upload_system_resources method to _cache_system_resources accurately reflects the updated functionality of caching the system GUI resources. Removing existing resources before updating is a good practice to ensure a clean and consistent state. The resource copying logic looks straightforward, and the debug logging adds visibility into the caching process.

Tools
Ruff

955-955: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)


953-953: LGTM!

The f-string is used correctly to construct the output path for caching system resources. The interpolation of the GUI_CACHE_PATH variable looks good, and the resulting path seems appropriate.

ovos_gui/namespace.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@JarbasAl JarbasAl marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 22:26
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/OVOS-workshop that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/OVOS-workshop that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
@JarbasAl JarbasAl marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 23:19
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-ocp-audio-plugin that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-ocp-audio-plugin that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-ocp-audio-plugin that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-shell-companion that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-shell-companion that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
JarbasAl added a commit to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-shell-companion that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
companion to OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui#53 and OpenVoiceOS/ovos-bus-client#120

this should be merged first as it does not require the others to work and does not break anything in the wild
@JarbasAl JarbasAl requested review from goldyfruit, j1nx, NeonDaniel and a team September 20, 2024 21:51
@NeonDaniel
Copy link
Member

This is configurable, I would prefer a deprecation warning before removing the functionality completely (maybe in 1.0.0?) since it is a breaking change.

@JarbasAl
Copy link
Member Author

JarbasAl commented Oct 9, 2024

its marked as breaking and we follow semver, so should not affect anything, besides this is not working properly so whats is there to keep compat with?

the bus upload was introduced to make it work in docker, and it isnt working properly there, it is a failed attempt that never worked right, this change is meant to solve that there (still being tested)

@JarbasAl
Copy link
Member Author

JarbasAl commented Oct 9, 2024

and yes, this is going to be 1.0.0 because of semver automations

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (2)

40-40: Approved changes, but consider adding more context.

The removal of file server and GUI file collection options aligns with the PR objectives to address CPU spikes and OOM errors. The added note about QT5 clients is helpful.

Consider adding a brief explanation about why these options were removed and how it affects the system's performance and stability. This would provide valuable context for users and maintainers.


Line range hint 1-58: Consider adding important implementation details.

The README currently doesn't mention two crucial points from the PR description:

  1. The bus client needs to be updated in all containers for this change to work properly.
  2. The ~/.cache/ovos_gui directory needs to be a shared volume.

Consider adding a section to the README that outlines these important implementation details. This will help users and maintainers understand the full scope of changes required when implementing this update.

ovos_gui/namespace.py (1)

297-299: Optimize List Comprehension Usage in Page Names Check

In the load_pages method, the expression [p.name for p in self.pages] is recalculated in each iteration of the loop, which is inefficient.

To improve performance, calculate the list of existing page names once before the loop:

existing_page_names = [p.name for p in self.pages]
for page in pages:
    if page.name not in existing_page_names:
        new_pages.append(page)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f2427e and 993ab7b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py (0 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/namespace.py (10 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
ovos_gui/namespace.py

910-910: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

Line range hint 1-58: Overall changes approved with suggestions for improvement.

The modifications to the README accurately reflect the removal of the GUI bus upload mechanism, which aligns with the PR objectives to address CPU spikes and OOM errors. The remaining configuration instructions are clear and concise.

To further improve the documentation:

  1. Consider adding a brief explanation of why certain options were removed and how it benefits system performance.
  2. Include information about updating bus clients in all containers and the need for a shared volume for ~/.cache/ovos_gui.

These additions would provide a more comprehensive guide for users implementing these changes.

ovos_gui/namespace.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ovos_gui/namespace.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)

42-53: LGTM: Valuable plugin information added

The new section on plugins provides useful information about platform-specific GUI functionality. This addition improves the documentation and aligns with the PR's objective of clarifying system components.

Consider formatting the URLs as proper markdown links for better readability:

- [OVOS GUI Plugin Shell Companion](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-shell-companion)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Mobile](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-mobile)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Plasmoid](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-plasmoid)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Bigscreen](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-bigscreen)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

49-49: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


50-50: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


51-51: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


52-52: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


55-58: LGTM: Important limitations section added

The new "Limitations" section provides crucial information about GUI resource files and their accessibility. This addition directly addresses the PR objectives by clarifying system limitations and the new approach to resource management.

There's a small typo in the word "expectd" on line 57. Please correct it to "expected":

-gui resources files are populated under `~/.cache/mycrot/ovos-gui` by skills and other OVOS components and are expectd to be accessible by GUI client applications
+gui resources files are populated under `~/.cache/mycrot/ovos-gui` by skills and other OVOS components and are expected to be accessible by GUI client applications

59-61: LGTM: Valuable information on GUI client expectations and future plans

This section provides important details about GUI client expectations and includes a TODO note about future improvements. This information aligns well with the PR objectives by explaining the new approach to resource management.

Consider a minor language improvement in line 59:

-This means GUI clients are expected to be running under the same machine or implement their own access to the resource files (resolving page names to uris is the client app responsibility)
+This means GUI clients are expected to be running on the same machine or implement their own access to the resource files (resolving page names to uris is the client app responsibility)

The preposition "on" is more commonly used when referring to software running on a machine.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~59-~59: The preposition “on” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... GUI clients are expected to be running under the same machine or implement their own...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)


63-64: LGTM: Important information for container usage added

This section provides crucial information for users working with containers, which aligns well with the PR objectives and helps clarify the new resource management approach.

Consider these minor grammatical improvements:

-In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted between ovos-gui, skills and gui client apps
+In the case of containers, a shared volume should be mounted between ovos-gui, skills and gui client apps

These changes improve readability and adhere to common English grammar conventions.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~63-~63: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...s-gui` to be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[typographical] ~63-~63: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...o be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted betwe...

(IN_CASE_OF_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 993ab7b and 36fa296.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~59-~59: The preposition “on” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... GUI clients are expected to be running under the same machine or implement their own...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)


[uncategorized] ~63-~63: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...s-gui` to be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[typographical] ~63-~63: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...o be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted betwe...

(IN_CASE_OF_COMMA)

🪛 Markdownlint
README.md

49-49: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


50-50: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


51-51: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


52-52: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

29-29: LGTM: Informative comment added

The added comment provides valuable information about the current state of GUI clients. This aligns well with the PR's objective of improving clarity and addressing system limitations.


Line range hint 1-64: Overall changes align well with PR objectives

The modifications to the README.md file effectively support the PR's main objectives:

  1. The removal of file server configuration options aligns with the goal of eliminating the problematic GUI bus upload mechanism.
  2. The new sections on limitations and container usage provide clear guidance on the new approach to resource management.
  3. The added information about plugins and GUI client expectations improves overall documentation and clarity.

These changes contribute to addressing the issues of CPU spikes and OOM errors by providing a clearer understanding of the system's new architecture and limitations.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~59-~59: The preposition “on” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ... GUI clients are expected to be running under the same machine or implement their own...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)


[uncategorized] ~63-~63: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...s-gui` to be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)


[typographical] ~63-~63: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...o be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted betwe...

(IN_CASE_OF_COMMA)

🪛 Markdownlint

49-49: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


50-50: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


51-51: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


52-52: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


This means GUI clients are expected to be running under the same machine or implement their own access to the resource files (resolving page names to uris is the client app responsibility)

> TODO: new repository with the removed GUI file server, serve files from `~/.cache/mycrot/ovos-gui` to be handled by client apps
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NeonDaniel not sure if you had a specific use case in mind, but please see this note

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
test/unittests/test_bus.py (1)

83-94: LGTM! Consider adding the missing import for List.

The implementation of _get_client_pages looks good. It correctly iterates over the pages in the namespace and resolves each page to a full URI.

To resolve the static analysis warning, consider adding the following import at the beginning of the file:

from typing import List
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

83-83: Undefined name List

(F821)

ovos_gui/bus.py (4)

142-148: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for comment clarity.

The modifications to the synchronize method align well with the PR objectives of dropping the GUI bus upload of resources. This change should help address the CPU spikes and OOM errors mentioned in the PR description.

Consider clarifying the comment slightly for better readability:

-# if uri (path) can not be resolved, it might exist client side
-# if path doesn't exist in client side, client is responsible for resolving page by namespace/name
+# If the URI (path) cannot be resolved server-side, it might exist client-side.
+# If the path doesn't exist client-side, the client is responsible for resolving the page by namespace/name.

250-256: Approve changes with a suggestion for code improvement.

The modifications to the send_gui_pages method are consistent with the changes made in the synchronize method and support the PR objectives of streamlining the GUI resource handling.

Consider extracting the repeated comment and page data structure into a shared constant or utility method to reduce code duplication:

def get_page_data(pages, framework):
    """
    If the URI (path) cannot be resolved server-side, it might exist client-side.
    If the path doesn't exist client-side, the client is responsible for resolving the page by namespace/name.
    """
    return [{"url": page.get_uri(framework), "page": page.name} for page in pages]

# In synchronize method
data = get_page_data(namespace.pages, self.framework)

# In send_gui_pages method
data = get_page_data(pages, framework)

This refactoring would improve maintainability and ensure consistency across both methods.


Line range hint 1-278: Summary: Changes effectively address PR objectives

The modifications made to ovos_gui/bus.py align well with the PR objectives of dropping the GUI bus upload of resources. These changes should help address the CPU spikes and out-of-memory (OOM) errors mentioned in the PR description by simplifying the GUI resource handling process.

Key improvements:

  1. Streamlined page data sending in both synchronize and send_gui_pages methods.
  2. Removal of the get_client_pages method, reducing unnecessary data transfer.
  3. Shifting responsibility for page resolution to the client when necessary.

These changes appear to be a step in the right direction for improving system stability and performance. However, as mentioned in the PR comments, thorough testing is crucial to ensure that these modifications work as expected across all scenarios.

To fully realize the benefits of these changes:

  1. Ensure that the bus client is updated in all containers, as mentioned in the PR description.
  2. Verify that ~/.cache/ovos_gui is set up as a shared volume where necessary.
  3. Consider adding logging or monitoring to track the performance improvements resulting from these changes, which could help validate the effectiveness of this new approach.

References to get_client_pages found in test files.

  • test/unittests/test_bus.py contains references to get_client_pages that need to be updated or removed to match the recent changes.

Please address these test references to prevent potential regressions.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-278: Approve removal of get_client_pages method with a verification suggestion.

The removal of the get_client_pages method aligns with the PR objectives of dropping the GUI bus upload of resources. This change should contribute to resolving the CPU spikes and OOM errors mentioned in the PR description.

To ensure this removal doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:

If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be reviewed and updated accordingly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removed method is not referenced elsewhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for any remaining references to 'get_client_pages'. Expect: No results.
rg --type python 'get_client_pages'

Length of output: 66


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removed method is not referenced elsewhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for any remaining references to 'get_client_pages'. Expect: No results.

rg 'get_client_pages'

Length of output: 333

ovos_gui/page.py (1)

43-43: Update docstring to reflect supported frameworks

The docstring states that only 'qt5' is supported, but the get_file_extension method handles both 'qt5' and 'qt6'. Consider updating the docstring to include 'qt6' as a supported framework.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36fa296 and 945e172.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • ovos_gui/bus.py (2 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/page.py (2 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_bus.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
test/unittests/test_bus.py

83-83: Undefined name List

(F821)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/unittests/test_bus.py (2)

110-120: LGTM! The test method has been updated correctly.

The changes to test_get_client_pages appropriately utilize the new _get_client_pages method while maintaining the existing test scenarios. The removal of commented-out test cases helps in keeping the test file clean and focused.


Line range hint 83-120: Summary: Improved code organization and maintainability

The changes in this file contribute to the PR's objective of streamlining GUI resource management. The introduction of the _get_client_pages method encapsulates the logic for retrieving client page URLs, improving code organization and readability. The test cases have been updated accordingly, maintaining proper coverage while simplifying the overall structure.

These modifications enhance the maintainability of the code without introducing breaking changes or performance issues. They align well with the goal of refining the GUI resource handling process.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

83-83: Undefined name List

(F821)

ovos_gui/page.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
protocol.md (2)

64-67: Approve the addition with a minor grammatical correction.

This new paragraph provides crucial information about handling GUI resources that cannot be resolved to a URL. It aligns well with the PR objectives of improving GUI resource management.

Consider applying this minor grammatical correction:

-If a gui resource can not be resolved to a url (*url* may be `None`!), it might still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/page in that case
+If a GUI resource cannot be resolved to a URL (*url* may be `None`!), it might still exist client-side. It is the client's responsibility to handle the namespace/page in that case.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)


Line range hint 1-274: Summary of protocol documentation changes.

The changes to the protocol documentation are well-aligned with the PR objectives of improving GUI resource management and addressing issues related to CPU spikes and OOM errors. The additions and modifications provide:

  1. Clarification on handling GUI resources that cannot be resolved to a URL.
  2. Updated structure for inserting new pages, adding more specificity to page identification.

These changes should contribute to more robust and efficient GUI handling in the OVOS system.

Consider adding a section or note about the performance implications of these changes, specifically addressing how they help mitigate the CPU spikes and OOM errors mentioned in the PR objectives. This would provide valuable context for developers implementing or maintaining the protocol.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)

test/unittests/test_namespace.py (1)

439-450: LGTM: Improved system resource caching test

The changes to the test_upload_system_resources method significantly improve the test coverage for the system resource caching mechanism. The use of GUI_CACHE_PATH, clearing the cache before testing, and specific assertions for cached resources enhance the test's effectiveness.

Consider adding a small improvement:

To ensure complete cleanup after the test, consider adding rmtree(p) within a finally block. This will ensure the test directory is always cleaned up, even if an assertion fails. Here's a suggested modification:

 def test_upload_system_resources(self):
     p = f"{GUI_CACHE_PATH}/system"
-    rmtree(p)
-    self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
-    self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
-    self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5",
-                                "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))
-    # Test repeated copy doesn't raise any exception
-    self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
-    self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
-    self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5",
-                                "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))
-    rmtree(p)
+    try:
+        rmtree(p)
+        self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
+        self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
+        self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5",
+                                    "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))
+        # Test repeated copy doesn't raise any exception
+        self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
+        self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
+        self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5",
+                                    "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))
+    finally:
+        rmtree(p)

This ensures that the test directory is always cleaned up, improving test isolation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 945e172 and 1a02acb.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • protocol.md (1 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_bus.py (4 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_gui_file_server.py (0 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_namespace.py (7 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_page.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • test/unittests/test_gui_file_server.py
  • test/unittests/test_page.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/unittests/test_bus.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
protocol.md

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)

🔇 Additional comments (8)
protocol.md (1)

74-74: Approve the change and verify implementation updates.

The addition of the "page" key in the "values" array provides more specificity in page identification. This change is consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.

Please ensure that both the server and client implementations have been updated to handle this new structure. Run the following script to verify the changes:

test/unittests/test_namespace.py (7)

25-25: LGTM: New import added for GUI_CACHE_PATH

The addition of this import is consistent with the changes made in the test_upload_system_resources method. It's a good practice to import constants from a centralized location.


133-135: LGTM: Consistent GuiPage instantiation updates

The changes in this method are consistent with the earlier modifications to GuiPage instantiations. The removal of the url parameter maintains the simplified page creation process.


150-152: LGTM: Consistent GuiPage instantiation updates

The changes in this method maintain consistency with the earlier modifications to GuiPage instantiations. The removal of the url parameter continues to simplify the page creation process throughout the test suite.


175-177: LGTM: Consistent GuiPage instantiation updates

The changes in the test_remove_pages method align with the earlier modifications to GuiPage instantiations. The removal of the url parameter maintains consistency in the simplified page creation process across various test scenarios.


262-262: LGTM: Consistent GuiPage instantiation update

The change in the test_handle_delete_page_active_namespace method is consistent with the earlier modifications to GuiPage instantiations. The removal of the url parameter maintains the simplified page creation process across different test contexts.


Line range hint 1-450: Summary of changes

The modifications in this file primarily focus on two aspects:

  1. Simplifying GuiPage instantiations by removing the url parameter across all test methods.
  2. Improving the system resource caching test by using GUI_CACHE_PATH and implementing more specific assertions.

These changes align with the PR objectives of addressing performance issues and improving system stability. The consistent updates to GuiPage instantiations suggest a broader change in the GuiPage class implementation, which should be verified. The enhanced system resource caching test provides better coverage for this critical functionality.

Overall, the changes appear to be well-implemented and consistent. They contribute to the goal of streamlining the GUI resource management process.


68-72: LGTM: Simplified GuiPage instantiations

The removal of the url parameter from GuiPage constructor calls simplifies the page creation process. This change is consistent with the modifications observed throughout the file.

Please ensure that the GuiPage class implementation has been updated to reflect this change. Run the following script to verify the GuiPage class definition:

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
README.md (3)

42-53: LGTM: Improved document structure with plugin information.

The reorganization of the "Plugins" section enhances the overall document structure. However, consider improving the markdown formatting for the plugin links.

Consider updating the plugin links to use proper markdown link syntax:

- [OVOS GUI Plugin Shell Companion](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-shell-companion)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Mobile](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-mobile)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Plasmoid](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-plasmoid)
- [OVOS GUI Plugin Bigscreen](https://github.com/OpenVoiceOS/ovos-gui-plugin-bigscreen)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

49-49: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


50-50: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


51-51: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


52-52: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


61-62: LGTM: Informative TODO note about future plans.

This TODO note provides valuable information about future plans regarding the removed GUI file server. It aligns well with the PR objectives and helps developers understand the ongoing changes in the project.

Consider formatting the TODO as a task list item for better visibility:

- [ ] TODO: new repository with the removed GUI file server, serve files from `~/.cache/mycrot/ovos-gui` to be handled by client apps

63-64: LGTM: Important information about container usage.

This addition provides crucial information for users working with containers, which is relevant to the changes in resource management.

Consider adding a comma after "In case of containers" for improved readability:

In case of containers, a shared volume should be mounted between ovos-gui, skills and gui client apps
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~63-~63: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...o be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted betwe...

(IN_CASE_OF_COMMA)

test/unittests/test_bus.py (3)

83-94: LGTM: New helper method for tests, with a minor suggestion.

The new _get_client_pages method is a good addition for test cases. It's well-documented and encapsulates the logic for retrieving page URIs.

However, consider using self.handler.framework instead of hardcoding "qt5" on line 92. This would make the method more flexible for testing different frameworks.

Suggested change:

- uri = page.get_uri("qt5")
+ uri = page.get_uri(self.handler.framework)

130-133: LGTM: Updated GuiPage mock objects with additional parameters.

The changes to the GuiPage mock objects reflect updates to the GuiPage class constructor. This aligns with the PR's goal of improving GUI resource management.

Consider updating the documentation for the test_send_gui_pages method to explain the significance of these new parameters if they affect the test's behavior or assertions.


138-139: LGTM: Updated assertions for framework usage and data structure.

The changes to the assertions in test_send_gui_pages correctly verify the use of the appropriate framework when getting page URIs. The updated data structure, including both "url" and "page" keys, reflects the changes in GUI resource management mentioned in the PR objectives.

Consider updating the test_send_gui_pages method documentation to explain the new data structure being sent to the GUI, particularly the inclusion of both URL and page identifier.

Also applies to: 144-144, 149-150, 155-155

protocol.md (2)

64-67: Approve addition with minor grammatical fix.

This addition provides valuable information for GUI client implementations, clarifying the client's responsibility when a GUI resource cannot be resolved to a URL. The example is helpful for developers.

Consider applying this minor grammatical fix:

-If a gui resource can not be resolved to a url (*url* may be `None`!), it might still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/page in that case
+If a gui resource can not be resolved to a url (*url* may be `None`!), it might still exist client side, it is the client's responsibility to handle the namespace/page in that case
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)


Line range hint 1-274: Overall, these changes improve the OVOS GUI service protocol documentation.

The modifications in this file enhance the clarity and functionality of the OVOS GUI service protocol. They address the issues mentioned in the PR objectives, particularly regarding GUI resource handling and streamlining the process. The changes are well-aligned with the broader modifications across the codebase and contribute to a more robust and efficient GUI management system.

Consider adding a version number or last updated date to the protocol documentation to help track changes over time.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)

ovos_gui/bus.py (3)

142-148: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for URI resolution.

The changes simplify the page insertion logic and provide clear comments on the URI resolution process. This aligns well with the PR objectives of dropping the GUI bus upload of resources.

Consider adding error handling for cases where page.get_uri(self.framework) might fail:

try:
    uri = page.get_uri(self.framework)
except Exception as e:
    LOG.warning(f"Failed to resolve URI for page {page.name}: {e}")
    uri = None  # or some default value

data = [{"url": uri, "page": page.name} for page in namespace.pages if uri is not None]

This would make the code more robust against potential URI resolution failures.


256-257: LGTM! Consider consistent naming for clarity.

The changes simplify the page data creation and align well with the PR objectives. For consistency with the synchronize method, consider using self.framework instead of framework.

Apply this minor change for consistency:

-            "data": [{"url": page.get_uri(framework), "page": page.name}
+            "data": [{"url": page.get_uri(self.framework), "page": page.name}
                     for page in pages]

This ensures consistent use of self.framework throughout the class.


Incomplete Deprecation of GUI Bus Upload Mechanism

A TODO comment remains in ovos_gui/namespace.py related to the deprecation of the GUI bus upload mechanism. This indicates that the deprecation process is not fully complete and may require further action.

  • Action Required: Remove or address the TODO comment in ovos_gui/namespace.py to ensure complete deprecation of the GUI bus upload mechanism.
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-277: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.

The modifications successfully simplify the code for handling GUI pages and align with the goal of dropping the GUI bus upload of resources. The added comments improve code clarity, and the changes are consistent across different methods.

A few minor suggestions have been made for error handling and naming consistency, but these are not critical issues. The changes appear to address the CPU spikes and OOM errors mentioned in the PR objectives by streamlining the resource handling process.

To ensure that these changes don't introduce any regressions, it would be beneficial to run the following verification:

This script will help ensure that all references to the old GUI bus upload mechanism have been removed and that the use of self.framework is consistent throughout the file.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that no references to the old GUI bus upload mechanism remain in the codebase.

# Test: Search for any remaining references to GUI bus upload
echo "Searching for references to GUI bus upload..."
rg -i "gui.*bus.*upload"

# Test: Check for any TODO comments related to GUI resource handling
echo "Checking for TODO comments related to GUI resource handling..."
rg -i "TODO.*gui.*resource"

# Test: Verify consistent use of self.framework
echo "Verifying consistent use of self.framework..."
rg "framework" ovos_gui/bus.py

Length of output: 1278


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Comprehensive search for remnants of the GUI bus upload mechanism.

# Test 1: Search for any TODO comments related to GUI bus upload.
echo "Searching for TODO comments related to GUI bus upload..."
rg -i "TODO.*gui.*bus.*upload"

# Test 2: Find all imports of namespace.py to ensure it's no longer in use.
echo "Searching for imports of namespace.py..."
rg 'import .*namespace' -- glob "*.py"

# Test 3: Look for any remaining references to GUI bus upload in the codebase.
echo "Searching for any references to GUI bus upload mechanism..."
rg -i "gui.*bus.*upload"

Length of output: 705

test/unittests/test_namespace.py (1)

433-444: LGTM with suggestions: Updated system resource caching test.

The changes align with the PR's objective of improving resource management. The use of GUI_CACHE_PATH and _cache_system_resources() suggests a more standardized approach to resource caching.

However, consider the following suggestions to improve test isolation:

  1. Mock the GUI_CACHE_PATH to use a temporary directory for testing.
  2. Mock the _cache_system_resources() method to avoid depending on the actual implementation.

These changes would make the test more robust and less dependent on the actual file system.

Here's a suggested refactor to improve test isolation:

import tempfile
from unittest.mock import patch

class TestNamespaceManager(TestCase):
    # ... other methods ...

    @patch('ovos_gui.namespace.GUI_CACHE_PATH')
    def test_upload_system_resources(self, mock_cache_path):
        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as temp_dir:
            mock_cache_path.return_value = temp_dir
            p = f"{temp_dir}/system"
            self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
            self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
            self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5", "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))
            
            # Test repeated copy doesn't raise any exception
            self.namespace_manager._cache_system_resources()
            self.assertTrue(isdir(join(p, "qt5")))
            self.assertTrue(isfile(join(p, "qt5", "SYSTEM_TextFrame.qml")))

This approach uses a temporary directory and mocking to isolate the test from the actual file system and cache implementation.

ovos_gui/page.py (2)

43-45: Clarify the return value in the docstring

The get_uri method may return None if the resource file is not found. Please update the @return section of the docstring to reflect this possibility.

Suggested change:

 @param framework: String GUI framework to get resources for (currently only 'qt5')
-@return: Absolute path to the requested resource
+@return: Absolute path to the requested resource or None if not found

47-47: Use os.path.join for path construction

To ensure platform-independent path handling, consider using os.path.join when constructing file paths.

Suggested change:

-path = f"{GUI_CACHE_PATH}/{self.res_namespace}/{framework}/{res_filename}"
+path = join(GUI_CACHE_PATH, self.res_namespace, framework, res_filename)
ovos_gui/namespace.py (1)

843-844: Avoid overwriting the message variable to prevent confusion

Reassigning the message variable may cause confusion and hinder readability. It's better to use a different variable name to hold the forwarded message.

Apply this diff to use a different variable name:

         LOG.info(f"GUI with ID {gui_id} connected to core message bus")
         websocket_config = get_gui_websocket_config()
         port = websocket_config["base_port"]
-        message = message.forward("mycroft.gui.port",
-                                  dict(port=port, gui_id=gui_id, framework=framework))
-        self.core_bus.emit(message)
+        forward_message = message.forward("mycroft.gui.port",
+                                          dict(port=port, gui_id=gui_id, framework=framework))
+        self.core_bus.emit(forward_message)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a02acb and 145d360.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/bus.py (2 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/constants.py (1 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py (0 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/namespace.py (10 hunks)
  • ovos_gui/page.py (2 hunks)
  • protocol.md (1 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_bus.py (4 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_gui_file_server.py (0 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_namespace.py (8 hunks)
  • test/unittests/test_page.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • ovos_gui/gui_file_server.py
  • test/unittests/test_gui_file_server.py
  • test/unittests/test_page.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • ovos_gui/constants.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[typographical] ~63-~63: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...o be handled by client apps In case of containers a shared volume should be mounted betwe...

(IN_CASE_OF_COMMA)

protocol.md

[uncategorized] ~64-~64: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...ight still exist client side, it is the clients responsibility to handle the namespace/...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)

🪛 Markdownlint
README.md

49-49: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


50-50: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


51-51: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


52-52: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🪛 Ruff
ovos_gui/namespace.py

920-920: f-string without any placeholders

Remove extraneous f prefix

(F541)

🔇 Additional comments (15)
README.md (2)

29-29: LGTM: Informative addition about QT5 clients.

This note provides valuable information for users about the current state of client support.


55-60: LGTM: Informative addition of "Limitations" section.

This new section clearly explains the expectations and limitations regarding GUI resource files and their accessibility. It provides valuable information for both users and developers, aligning well with the changes in resource management mentioned in the PR objectives.

test/unittests/test_bus.py (2)

3-3: LGTM: Import of List for type hinting.

The addition of from typing import List is a good practice. It suggests the use of type hinting, which improves code readability and helps catch type-related errors early.


105-107: LGTM: Updated test case for client pages retrieval.

The changes to test_get_client_pages correctly reflect the new implementation using the _get_client_pages method. The assertions now properly verify that the correct framework is used when retrieving page URIs.

ovos_gui/bus.py (1)

250-251: LGTM! Consistent comments improve code clarity.

The addition of these comments in the send_gui_pages method provides consistency with the synchronize method and improves overall code clarity.

test/unittests/test_namespace.py (7)

25-25: LGTM: New import for GUI_CACHE_PATH constant.

This import aligns with the PR objectives and is likely used in the updated resource caching logic.


133-135: LGTM: Consistent removal of url parameter from GuiPage instantiations.

These changes are in line with the modifications observed earlier and maintain consistency throughout the test cases.


150-152: LGTM: Consistent removal of url parameter from GuiPage instantiations.

These changes maintain consistency with the earlier modifications, ensuring uniform treatment of GuiPage objects throughout the test suite.


175-177: LGTM: Consistent removal of url parameter from GuiPage instantiations.

The changes in this method align with the previous modifications, maintaining a consistent approach to GuiPage object creation throughout the test cases.


Line range hint 1-444: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives and improve test consistency.

The modifications to this test file are consistent with the PR's goal of streamlining GUI resource management and addressing performance issues. Key improvements include:

  1. Removal of the url parameter from GuiPage instantiations, simplifying object creation.
  2. Updates to message data structures, reflecting changes in how page identifiers are referenced.
  3. Refactoring of the system resource caching test to use a more standardized approach.

While these changes are generally positive, consider the suggestions for improving test isolation, particularly in the test_upload_system_resources method. This will enhance the robustness and reliability of the test suite.


261-261: LGTM: Updated message data structure.

The change from "page" to "page_names" aligns with the PR's goal of improving GUI resource management.

Please ensure that this change is consistent with the corresponding implementation in the NamespaceManager class. Run the following script to verify:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: NamespaceManager class has been updated to use 'page_names' accordingly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify NamespaceManager class changes
# Expected: Occurrences of 'page_names' instead of 'page' in relevant methods

rg -p 'def handle_delete_page' ovos_gui
rg -p 'page_names' ovos_gui

Length of output: 434


68-72: LGTM: Removed url parameter from GuiPage instantiations.

This change simplifies the GuiPage creation process and aligns with the PR's goal of streamlining GUI resource management.

Please ensure that these changes are consistent with modifications made to the GuiPage class. Run the following script to verify:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: url parameter has been successfully removed from all GuiPage instantiations.

No occurrences of the url parameter were found in any GuiPage instances across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GuiPage class changes
# Expected: No occurrences of 'url' parameter in GuiPage instantiations

rg -p 'GuiPage\(' ovos_gui

Length of output: 137


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any GuiPage instantiations with 'url' parameter
# Expected: No occurrences of 'GuiPage(' with 'url='

rg 'GuiPage\([^)]*url=' ovos_gui

Length of output: 34

ovos_gui/page.py (2)

36-38: Potential issue when namespace is None


47-47: Resolved GUI pages limited to local files

ovos_gui/namespace.py (1)

446-446: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused variable config in _init_gui_file_share method

The variable config is assigned but never used, which can be removed to clean up the code.

Apply this diff to remove the unused variable:

 def _init_gui_file_share(self):
-    config = Configuration().get("gui", {})
     self._cache_system_resources()

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

protocol.md Show resolved Hide resolved
ovos_gui/namespace.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ovos_gui/namespace.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants