[LookupAnything] Add integration with Extra Machine Config's multiple output items feature #1028
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
API Reference
For now basically add new recipes with the same ingredient list but new output items taken from EMC's API. It does mean the lookup can't distinguish between "the recipe can produce one of these items" and "the recipe will produce all of these items", but I don't think it's important to distinguish (and any solutions I can think of to distinguish them leads to combinatorics explosions if there are multiple possible outputs for each 'slots'). Plus, this is also how things currently work with building conversion recipes (e.g. Mill).