Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding tests for all PennyLane transforms #1215

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

willjmax
Copy link

This PR adds unit tests for all PennyLane transforms. This PR addresses [sc-72626].

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.96%. Comparing base (0bcc64c) to head (2ca613b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1215   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.96%   97.96%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines       11244    11244           
  Branches      967      967           
=======================================
  Hits        11015    11015           
  Misses        180      180           
  Partials       49       49           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
Please edit doc/releases/changelog-dev.md on your branch with:

  • A one-to-two sentence description of the change. You may include a small working example for new features.
  • A link back to this PR.
  • Your name (or GitHub username) in the contributors section.

@paul0403
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for adding this, I will take a closer look in a bit, but first @mlxd , what's the guideline on large batches of xfailed python tests like this? Do we prefer skip over xfail, to save CI execution time?

For context, @willjmax is going over the core PL transforms and testing whether qjit works with them or not. If they don't work, a reason is noted in this testing file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants