-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
52 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | ||
| # Weekly update for: 31-07-2023 | ||
|
|
||
| ## :singer: Individual updates | ||
|
|
||
| - **@isabela-pf** | ||
|
|
||
| **Thanks I'd like to give 🙌** | ||
|
|
||
| **Updates from last week :heavy_check_mark:** | ||
|
|
||
| - #184 [I replied to more review](https://github.com/Quansight-Labs/JupyterLab-user-testing/pull/10). I think I've caught everything that I feel confident in fixing. There's still one comment about the questions for next time and such not following the narrative. I think the easiest solution would be to remove them outright, which I'm not against if it seems fitting. Once this has a source of truth, I can add it to jupyter/surveys. | ||
| - #178 JupyterLab 3.4.4 [accessibility statement has a PR to the JupyterLab docs](https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/pull/14856) hasn't had movement, but I brought it up in-meeting. | ||
| - #147 and #18 [Space Telescope user testing has a PR to jupyter/surveys now open](https://github.com/jupyter/surveys/pull/26). | ||
| - #147 and #18 I'm also waiting for approval to post an edited (removing personal info) version of the Space Telescope proposal on jupyter/accessibility to continue collecting references for accessibility funding. | ||
|
|
||
| **Challenges I faced and things I'd like assistance with 🙏** | ||
| - I don't have anything right now. Not everything needs to be reviewed singularly by this team, so I'm open to whatever you all want to prioritize reviewing versus not. | ||
|
|
||
| **My availability for next week** | ||
| - I'll be here all week. | ||
|
|
||
| **Important items for discussion 💬** | ||
| - Can we have a timeline/allocation check in? | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| - **@gabalafou** | ||
|
|
||
| **Updates from last week :heavy_check_mark:** | ||
| - Finally added unit tests and moved this out of draft: https://github.com/jupyterlab/lumino/pull/607 | ||
| - My highest priorities now are (but I haven't made any progress yet): | ||
| - Merging in focus-visible test to testing repo | ||
| - Documentation tasks | ||
| - Opening PRs for the remaining JupyterLab tab traps | ||
| - Prioritizing one or two tasks for the testing repo | ||
|
|
||
| **My availability for next week** | ||
| - I'm off Friday, July 28 and Monday, July 31. | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| - **@trallard** | ||
|
|
||
| @isabela-pf - only remaining item is to open a PR against jupyter/surveys | ||
| - X-ref user testing to accessibility and survey repos 🎉 | ||
|
|
||
| @gabalafou | ||
| - focus visible PR can be merged into the jupyterlab-testing repo | ||
| - get terminal tab trap PR sorted | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| :link: See the original issue at: <https://api.github.com/repos/Quansight-Labs/jupyter-a11y-mgmt/issues/229> | ||
|
|