Use MI300 chip_id instead of model to detect XCD count #448
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In a previous change we began using "MI300" for gpu_model instead of the full "MI300X_A0" or "MI300X_A1", etc.
The XCD detection code was receiving gpu_model and expecting the full name, causing the XCD count = 1 and several metrics to be off by a factor of 8 (e.g. VALU utilization, wavefront occupancy).
Passing chip_id instead of gpu_model fixes the issue.