Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ByteCodeBlock of top CodeBlock should not be removed from VMInstance #1385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

ByteCodeBlock of top CodeBlock should not be removed from VMInstance #1385

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

ksh8281
Copy link
Contributor

@ksh8281 ksh8281 commented Sep 10, 2024

  • If there is GC jobs from Script init to Script execution, the ByteCode can be remove by ByteCode prunning. this is wrong

@ksh8281
ByteCodeBlock of top CodeBlock should not be removed from VMInstance
b445f17 
* If there is GC jobs from Script init to Script execution, the ByteCode can be remove by ByteCode prunning. this is wrong

Signed-off-by: Seonghyun Kim <sh8281.kim@samsung.com>
@clover2123 clover2123 merged commit 55d3c17 into Samsung:master Sep 10, 2024
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clover2123 clover2123 clover2123 approved these changes

@bbrto21 bbrto21 Awaiting requested review from bbrto21 bbrto21 is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ksh8281 @clover2123