docs: Cherry-Markdown Competitor-Analysis #899
+1,130
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
【预览链接】 |
完善内容Update markdown editor security risks
完善内容Update Competitive product display
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
本项目Cherry-Markdown Competitor-Analysis是2024腾讯犀牛鸟开源人才培养计划—Cherry Markdown中的竞品分析任务。此次分析将从语法能力、功能、安全、性能、扩展能力以及引擎实现方式和二次开发难易程度等多个维度展开，全面对比 Cherry Markdown 与其他主要 Markdown 编辑器的差异。
9.5提交的pr已关闭，后续将在这里继续进行进度提交。内容写得比较粗糙，恳请各位导师批评指教😊。