You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
tonyelewis
changed the title
Some cath-ssaps work with --prot-src-files of PDB_DSSP but not PDB
Some pairs fail under cath-ssap that work with SSAP
Nov 20, 2017
tonyelewis
changed the title
Some pairs fail under cath-ssap that work with SSAP
Some pairs fail under cath-ssap with PDB_DSSP that work with PDB_DSSP_SEC
Dec 15, 2017
I've looked a little bit into 1dx5I02 versus 1yukB02 and found that:
the reason it works under PDB_DSSP_SEC is that it's doing a fast_ssap; the following slow_ssap it does fails.
the reason it fails under PDB_DSSP is because it doesn't do a fast_ssap because it deduces that there aren't any secondary structures in 1dx5I02
whereas prosec has assigned five beta-strand secondary structures: residues with indices (offset 1) 5-8, 8-11, 17-20, 25-28, 30-33, which correspond to residues 394-397, 397-400, 406-409, 414-417, 419-422
each of those stretches covers four residues in which prosec has assigned beta-strands to the middle two.
So this could probably fixed by more work to improve the code's ability to replicate the behaviour in prosec / secmake. That should be done with (a) test-cases to demonstrate the specific improvement (b) the use of large-scale comparisons to ensure that specific changes are reducing overall errors, not increasing them.
But it's also worth noting that all the versions are failing to achieve anything in the slow ssap here and that's probably the more significant problem.
Note that these don't work with
--prot-src-files
ofPDB_DSSP
either.Examples where both proteins have ≥ 30 residues :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: