Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release tasty-1.5.1, tasty-quickcheck-0.11, tasty-hunit-0.10.2 #420

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2024

Conversation

Bodigrim
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@VictorCMiraldo VictorCMiraldo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Thank you!

@Bodigrim Bodigrim merged commit 298f69b into master Jun 22, 2024
14 checks passed
@Bodigrim Bodigrim deleted the release-1.5.1 branch June 22, 2024 10:04
@Bodigrim
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Apparently changes to cursor manipulations broke things:

All
  read:          OK8  ms ±  23 ms
    278  ms ±  23 ms
  write:         OK0  ms ±  38 ms
    900  ms ±  38 ms
  index build:   OK1  ms ±  15 ms
    521  ms ±  15 ms
  index rebuild: OK0  ms ± 7.5 ms
    110  ms ± 7.5 ms

I revised tasty-1.5.1 to decomission it for time being: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/tasty-1.5.1/revisions/

@Bodigrim
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Apparently reverting b152a0b is enough to restore proper behavior.

@sergv
Copy link
Contributor

sergv commented Jul 7, 2024

@Bodigrim Looks like reverting b152a0b is the way to go: issuing \r clears part of line between first column and current cursor, but keeps content after cursor unchanged.

Because of printed progress message there may be text after cursor position which will not get cleared in ANSI-compliant terminals. Emacs seems to be not compliant and clears whole line when it sees \r so reverting the commit would not interfere with original intention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants