Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Editorial: Fix bad linking due to removed ContinuationPriority (#103)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
shaseley authored Aug 9, 2024
1 parent ab9bdc9 commit 4b53840
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 5 deletions.
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions spec/security.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ possible for an attacker to further reduce the set of potential tasks that can
run instead of its own by leveraging this priority. For example, if a UA uses a
simple static prioritization scheme spanning all event loops in a thread, then
using "{{TaskPriority/user-blocking}}" {{Scheduler/postTask()}} tasks or
"{{ContinuationPriority/user-visible}}" and higher priority
{{Scheduler/yield()}} continuations — which are meant to have a higher
event loop priority — instead of {{Window/postMessage(message,
options)|postMessage()}} tasks might decrease this set, depending on their
relative prioritization and what runs between.
"{{TaskPriority/user-visible}}" and higher priority {{Scheduler/yield()}}
continuations — which are meant to have a higher event loop priority
— instead of {{Window/postMessage(message, options)|postMessage()}} tasks
might decrease this set, depending on their relative prioritization and what
runs between.

**What Mitigations are Possible?** <br/>
There are mitigations that implementers can consider to minimize the risk:
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4b53840

Please sign in to comment.