Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a routed net helper method that automatically sets PIP.setIsReversed() correctly for used bidirectional PIPs #580

Open
clavin-xlnx opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@clavin-xlnx
Copy link
Member

For #575 and future updates to work correctly, PIPs will need to properly set PIP.setIsReversed() on bidirectional PIPs. This is most optimally done at the point of creation in the correct context. This issue requests a new helper method that can be used to ensure and/or correct PIPs that do not have this flag set properly with the expense of O(n), where n is the number of PIPs on the net.

@eddieh-xlnx
Copy link
Collaborator

@clavin-xlnx In light of #774, is there still a need for this helper method?

This issue references #575, which is responsible for unrouting nets, stating that it relies on PIP.isReversed() to be correct to function correctly. With #774, RWRoute should now set this flag correctly.

@clavin-xlnx
Copy link
Member Author

@clavin-xlnx In light of #774, is there still a need for this helper method?

This issue references #575, which is responsible for unrouting nets, stating that it relies on PIP.isReversed() to be correct to function correctly. With #774, RWRoute should now set this flag correctly.

I suppose it becomes less important, I suppose for other users developing routing solutions they can either manage the issue on their own or write their own helper method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants