Haddock | Hackage: solga / solga-swagger | Stackage: solga / solga-swagger
A library for easily specifying web APIs and implementing them in a type-safe way.
At the center of Solga is a typeclass called Router
. You can serve any Router
as a WAI application:
serve :: Router r => r -> Wai.Application
Router
s are generally simple newtypes
. For example, to serve a fixed JSON response, just use:
-- From Solga:
newtype JSON a = JSON {jsonResponse :: a}
instance ToJSON a => Router (JSON a)
This router will respond to every request with the given jsonResponse
, ie. serve (JSON "It works!")
produces an Application
that always responds with "It works!".
Routers can also be composed. Let's say you only want to respond to GET requests under /does-it-work
. We'll encode the path and the method in the type itself with DataKinds
.
type MyAPI = Seg "does-it-work" (Method "GET" (JSON Text))
myAPI :: MyAPI
myAPI = Seg (Method (JSON "It works"))
There's some syntactic sugar we can apply here. First, let's use the :>
operator to compose our routers. This is the same as type application.
-- From Solga:
-- type f :> g = f g
type MyAPI = Seg "does-it-work" :> Method "GET" :> JSON Text
Second, we can replace Seg
with />
:
-- From Solga:
-- type (/>) (seg :: Symbol) g = Seg seg :> g
type MyAPI = "does-it-work" /> Method "GET" :> JSON Text
And third, we can get rid of the constructor boilerplate using brief
:
myAPI :: MyAPI
myAPI = brief "It works!"
What if we want to serve multiple different routes? It's easy - any product of Routers is automatically a Router, and Solga will try each field in order:
data MyAPI = MyAPI
{ doesItWork :: "does-it-work" /> Method "GET" :> JSON Text
, whatAboutThis :: "what-about-this" /> Method "GET" :> JSON Text
} deriving (Generic)
instance Router MyAPI
instance Abbreviated MyAPI
myAPI :: MyAPI
myAPI = MyAPI
{ doesItWork = brief "It works!"
, whatAboutThis = brief "It also works!"
}
We can nest these record routers as expected:
data UserAPI = UserAPI {..}
data WidgetAPI = WidgetAPI {..}
data MyAPI = MyAPI
{ userAPI :: "user" /> UserAPI
, widgetAPI :: "widget" /> WidgetAPI
} deriving (Generic)
What if we want to capture a path segment? Let's see:
-- newtype Capture a next = Capture {captureNext :: a -> next}
data MyAPI = MyAPI
{ echo :: "echo" /> Method "GET" :> Capture Text :> JSON Text
} deriving (Generic)
instance Router MyAPI
instance Abbreviated MyAPI
myAPI :: MyAPI
myAPI = MyAPI
{ echo = brief id -- short for: Seg $ Method $ Capture $ \captured -> JSON captured
}
How about doing IO?
data MyAPI = MyAPI
{ rng :: "rng" /> Method "GET" :> WithIO :> JSON Int
} deriving (Generic)
instance Router MyAPI
instance Abbreviated MyAPI
myAPI :: MyAPI
myAPI = MyAPI
{ rng = brief (getStdRandom random)
}
Solga comes with a large set of useful Routers for parsing request bodies and producing responses. See the documentation for more details.
To create a router yourself, just implement the Router typeclass:
-- | The right hand side of `Application`. `Request` is already known.
type Responder = (Wai.Response -> IO Wai.ResponseReceived) -> IO Wai.ResponseReceived
class Router r where
-- | Given a request, if the router supports the given request
-- return a function that constructs a response with a concrete router.
tryRoute :: Wai.Request -> Maybe (r -> Responder)
In Solga, all routing decisions are performed purely on the type of the Router - it's not possible to use its value to decide whether to accept a request or not. This is because this way an outer router can predict whether an inner router will match, even if the value of its implementation is non-deterministic.
For example, let's consider the router CustomAuthRouter :> "foo" /> WithIO :> JSON Text
. We don't know exactly how "foo" /> WithIO :> JSON Text
will be executed, as it contains WithIO
. However, because of the restriction above, we can predict that it will only work for a path /foo
. and so if we get a request with /bar
, there's no need to do any authentication.
This is why the type of tryRoute
is Wai.Request -> Maybe (r -> Responder)
. The router instance essentially says "I can't handle this request, try something else" or "I can handle this, please give me the implementation".
For example, here is the implementation of the JSON
router:
instance Aeson.ToJSON a => Router (JSON a) where
tryRoute _ = Just $ \json cont ->
cont $ Wai.responseBuilder HTTP.status200 headers $ Aeson.encodeToBuilder $ Aeson.toJSON $ jsonResponse json
where headers = [ ( HTTP.hContentType, "application/json" ) ]
tryRouteNext
is a very useful function for implementing routers:
tryRouteNext :: Router r' => (r -> r') -> Wai.Request -> Maybe (r -> Responder)
tryRouteNextIO :: Router r' => (r -> IO r') -> Wai.Request -> Maybe (r -> Responder)
Essentially, if you can convert from your type r
to another Router type r'
, you get the implementation for tryRoute
for free. With this, it's easy to implement the Servant "fish operator":
data left :<|> right = (:<|>) { altLeft :: left, altRight :: right }
deriving (Eq, Ord, Show)
infixr 1 :<|>
instance (Router left, Router right) => Router (left :<|> right) where
tryRoute req = tryRouteNext altLeft req <|> tryRouteNext altRight req
Or Seg
:
newtype Seg (seg :: Symbol) next = Seg { segNext :: next }
deriving (Eq, Ord, Show)
instance (KnownSymbol seg, Router next) => Router (Seg seg next) where
tryRoute req = case Wai.pathInfo req of
s : segs | Text.unpack s == symbolVal (Proxy :: Proxy seg) ->
tryRouteNext segNext req { Wai.pathInfo = segs }
_ -> Nothing
You can also generate Swagger specifications for your API for free. Just use the solga-swagger
package, derive RouterSwagger
the same way as Router
, and use the genSwagger
function to get your specification.
genSwagger :: RouterSwagger r => Proxy r -> Either (Text, Context) Swagger
It's possible for an API type to not be specific enough (not matching a Method), or to be inconsistent (matching two different request bodies). In this case, an error will be returned.