-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configure Windows builds #2
Changes from all commits
a934226
01ef105
d253969
935a560
fc454d1
e8c7747
e5e7dac
3d8e92d
9db705c
40936af
b009c8e
f2ac609
c18af58
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
c_compiler: | ||
- vs2019 | ||
channel_sources: | ||
- conda-forge | ||
channel_targets: | ||
- conda-forge main | ||
cxx_compiler: | ||
- vs2019 | ||
target_platform: | ||
- win-64 |
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that we know it was patchelf causing issues, perhaps it's time to remove this workaround?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK the
patchelf
bug is not fixed: NixOS/patchelf#492So no don't think we should be removing that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's not fixed (I am fully aware), but we marked 0.18.0 as broken (you did it 🙂) and there's no 0.18.1 yet. I'd assume we are safe for now, and be extra cautious when a new patchelf is out.
We can even go further and pin patchelf globally, which I was surprised to see not done yet. We should consider it given its high impact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would rather not open us to unnecessary risk with
patchelf
. This keeps us protectedWe explored that before ( conda-forge/conda-smithy#1737 ), but there wasn't a good option to pursue ( conda-forge/conda-smithy#1737 (comment) )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant to add patchelf to conda-forge-pinning-feedstock, not conda-smithy. Is it not an option (and why)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unclear on how that would help.
conda-forge-pinning
only affects dependencies in therequirements
of recipes themselvesNot build tools like
patchelf
that are installed inbase
(before the recipe is seen). This would require changes toconda-smithy
to workThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, John, I see. I think this is where it confused me.
I know for a fact that installing patchelf to host could help ignore the one installed by conda-smithy. But it requires the recipe maintainer to manually add patchelf to host, which is something awkward that we don't want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And there would still be a
patchelf
installed inbase
thatconda-build
would use. IOW the problem would still be there