alan/rr-124-pagination-style-better-that-whole-button-is-clickable

[alanbiju79]

📜 Description

🖼 Proof of Work

---

	🚀 This PR description was created by Ellipsis for commit 59401f0.

Summary:

This PR improves the user experience of pagination buttons by making the entire button clickable and ensuring the cursor style is consistent for active pages.

Key points:

• Improved the user experience of pagination buttons by making the entire button clickable.
• Ensured the cursor style is consistent for active pages.
• Moved padding styles from .page to .page a class in /app/assets/stylesheets/application.tailwind.css.
• Added display: block; to .page a class to make the entire button clickable.
• Updated cursor-auto to cursor-auto !important; in .page.active class to override other cursor styles.

---

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

[render]

Your Render PR Server URL is https://rails-starter-pr-112.onrender.com.

Follow its progress at https://dashboard.render.com/web/srv-cnpf4tfjbltc73frv4p0.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me!

• Reviewed the entire pull request up to 985c42b
• Looked at 27 lines of code in 1 files
• Took 1 minute and 9 seconds to review

More info

• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.

1. app/assets/stylesheets/application.tailwind.css:401:

• Assessed confidence : 90%
• Grade: 0%
• Comment:
  Avoid using !important as it increases the specificity of a rule and can make future CSS changes more difficult. Consider increasing the specificity of the CSS selector or rearranging the CSS rules so that the desired rule takes precedence.
• Reasoning:
  The PR author has added a new CSS rule to make the entire pagination button clickable, which is a good usability improvement. However, the use of !important on line 401 to override the cursor style for the active page is generally discouraged. It's better to increase the specificity of the CSS selector or to rearrange the CSS rules so that the desired rule takes precedence.

Workflow ID: wflow_TIvDKSSb7MXwXaNP

---

Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me!

• Performed an incremental review on 59401f0
• Looked at 26 lines of code in 1 files
• Took 1 minute and 53 seconds to review

More info

• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of 50%.

1. app/assets/stylesheets/application.tailwind.css:393:

• Assessed confidence : 33%
• Comment:
  The changes made in this PR seem to be logically correct and follow best practices. However, it would be good to double-check the impact of these changes on the rest of the codebase. Specifically, ensure that the changes to the .page a and .page.active classes do not inadvertently affect other elements that use these classes.
• Reasoning:
  The changes made in the PR seem to be logically correct and follow best practices. The padding has been moved from the .page class to the .page a class, making the entire button clickable. The display: block; property has been added to the .page a class, which is a good practice for making the entire button clickable. The cursor-auto !important; has been added to the .page.active class to override other cursor styles, ensuring the cursor style is consistent for active pages. I don't see any clear violations of best practices, logical bugs, performance bugs, or security bugs. However, I would like to double-check the impact of these changes on the rest of the codebase.

Workflow ID: wflow_wdHXThkQjmZrvIOG

---

Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.