Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v1.40.0 #3473

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024
Merged

Release v1.40.0 #3473

merged 12 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

tanmay-db
Copy link
Contributor

@tanmay-db tanmay-db commented Apr 16, 2024

New Features and Improvements

Documentation Changes

  • Use correct provider alias in AWS E2 provisioning guide (#3425).
  • Document pricing_tier of databricks_mws_workspaces resource (#3433).
  • Updated documentation for Delta Sharing resources; refactoring relevant resources & data sources (#3466).
  • Added description for new fields in databricks_lakehouse_monitor
  • Update about using Databricks-managed service principals in all clouds (#3482)

Exporter

  • Decrease a need for get-status calls for directories when listing workspace objects (#3470).
  • Don't emit permissions and grants if object is going to be ignored (#3417).
  • Don't generate references to ignored resources (#3418).
  • Generate resource data from the object status obtained during the listing operation (#3460).
  • Improve emitting of directories (#3462).
  • Skip listing of jobs deployed with DABs (#3445).

Internal Changes

  • Migrated databricks_cluster resource to Go SDK (#3376).
  • Used ClusterSpec in databricks_cluster resource (#3459).
  • Bump Go SDK to v0.38.0 (#3458).
  • Bump golang.org/x/mod from 0.16.0 to 0.17.0 (#3435).
  • Clean up integration tests and expose helper functions for identifying cloud (#3438).
  • Fix integration tests for databricks_entitlements (#3467).
  • Switch to use structs from Go SDK for databricks_recipient resource (#3400).
  • Make libraries in resource_job slice instead of set (#3398).
  • Fixed TestUcAccJobRunAsMutations
  • Ensure tests are only run in the selected environment (#3476)
  • Use fixture cluster for databricks_sql_permissions integration test (#3483)
  • Improve integration tests for databricks_model_serving (#3479)

@tanmay-db tanmay-db requested review from a team as code owners April 16, 2024 11:56
@tanmay-db tanmay-db requested review from hectorcast-db, alexott, mgyucht and nkvuong and removed request for a team April 16, 2024 11:56
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@cac7606). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3473   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   82.43%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      181           
  Lines           ?    16945           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    13969           
  Misses          ?     2104           
  Partials        ?      872           
Files Coverage Δ
common/version.go 80.00% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, given Vuong's suggestions are committed

tanmay-db and others added 4 commits April 16, 2024 19:17
Co-authored-by: vuong-nguyen <44292934+nkvuong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: vuong-nguyen <44292934+nkvuong@users.noreply.github.com>
@tanmay-db tanmay-db added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit ec030f2 Apr 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@tanmay-db tanmay-db deleted the prepare/1.40.0 branch April 18, 2024 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants