Caceves/appeals 25907 rubocop #3563
Annotations
5 errors and 5 warnings
spec/feature/queue/attorney_checkout_flow_spec.rb#L64
Attorney checkout flow given a valid ama appeal submits draft decision
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_content "This field is required"
expected to find text "This field is required" in "CaseflowQueue\nSearch cases\nDEFAULT_USER (VACO)\nAdd decisions\nAdd decisions to each issue the Veteran is appealing. Any decisions you add must be connected to at least one issue on appeal. This helps Caseflow gather metrics on BVA decisions and meet AMA reporting requirements.\nYou must add a decision before you continue.\nBenefit type: Compensation\nIssue: Tinnitus\nDiagnostic code: 5000\nNote from NOD: Test note\n+ Add decision\nYou must add a decision before you continue.\nBenefit type: Compensation\nIssue: Tinnitus\nDiagnostic code: 5000\nNote from NOD: Test note\n+ Add decision\nAdd decision\nIssue\nTinnitus\nDescribe what the Veteran is appealing and what you decided.\nYou can also add additional decisions to better address the Veteran's concerns or situation.\nDisposition\nDisposition field is required\nSelect disposition\n\nDescription\nEx: Entitlement to a 10% rating for arthritis of the right knee is granted\nText box field is required\nDiagnostic code\n5000\nBenefit type\nCompensation\nDo you want to add this decision to other issues on appeal? This could occur when you determine that two or more issues should receive a single decision.\nEx: Service connection for restless leg syndrome (right) and Service connection for restless leg syndrome (left) should be Service connection for restless leg syndrome (bilateral).\nIssues\nSelect issues\nClose\nSave\nCancelBack\nContinue\nSend feedback"
|
spec/feature/queue/attorney_checkout_flow_spec.rb#L419
Attorney checkout flow given a valid legacy appeal with four issues submits draft decision
Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_content(COPY::NO_CASES_IN_QUEUE_MESSAGE)
expected to find text "You have no cases assigned to you. You can " in "CaseflowQueue\nSearch cases\nDEFAULT_USER (VACO)\nSubmit Draft Decision for Review\nComplete the details below to submit this Draft Decision request for judge review.\nThe issues are out of sync\nThe issues on this case have changed. Please refresh the page and submit your decision again.\nDocument ID:\nSubmit to judge:\nAaron JudgeSelect another judge\nNotes:\nthis is a decision note\n327 characters left\nThis work product is overtime\nCancelBack\nContinue\nSend feedback"
|
spec/models/task_spec.rb#L250
Task#prepared_by_display_name when there is an attorney_case_review should return the most recent attorney case review
Failure/Error: expect(task.prepared_by_display_name).to eq(%w[Bob Smith])
expected: ["Bob", "Smith"]
got: nil
(compared using ==)
|
spec/models/task_spec.rb#L343
Task#latest_attorney_case_review when there is a sub task should return the most recent attorney case review
Failure/Error: expect(task.latest_attorney_case_review).to eq(attorney_case_reviews.first)
expected: #<AttorneyCaseReview id: 2, appeal_id: 19, appeal_type: "LegacyAppeal", attorney_id: 110, created_at:...ask_id: "79", untimely_evidence: false, updated_at: "2023-07-19 17:06:10", work_product: "Decision">
got: nil
(compared using ==)
|
|
spec/workflows/post_decision_motion_updater_spec.rb#L69
PostDecisionMotionUpdater#process when disposition is granted when vacate type is vacate and readjudication should create decision issues on new vacate
Skipped: Not yet implemented
|
spec/models/idt/token_spec.rb#L53
Idt::Token#active? returns false after a token expires
Skipped: Temporarily skipped with xit
|
|
|
|
The logs for this run have expired and are no longer available.
Loading