AA-398: Standardize 'preVerificationGas' verification & create 'debug_bundler_setConfiguration' #228
Conversation
| /** | ||
| * The size of the dummy 'signature' parameter to be used during estimation. | ||
| */ | ||
| readonly estimationSignatureSize: number |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if we should estimate signature size at all: there shouldn't be a "standard" sig size. The wallet should fill it in.
Same for paymaster: if there isn't a pmd, we should estimate based on no pmd, not provide a "hint" that there is a "suggested" value for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This does not make sense to me. There absolutely is no "standard" sig size and this configuration parameter is exactly the result of that. In order to estimate the preVerificationGas we must know what the size of the signature will be in the future.
When the wallet comes to a point where it needs to estimate the amount of preVerificationGas, if it did not take into account the signature size or the paymasterData size, it would calculate a lower than necessary preVerificationGas and its UserOps would be rejected.
NOTE that the "validation" step absolutely does not rely on estimation-related configuration parameters and relies on the real value.
If you still disagree please elaborate how you expect preVerificationGas to work alternatively.
Thanks.
forshtat
changed the title
No description provided.