Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update research-overview.mdx #1078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Update research-overview.mdx #1078

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pages/research/research-overview.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ As we’ve discussed above, experiments are well-suited for a specific type of q
We’ll continue to update this section as we analyze and publish ongoing studies. Some questions we’re currently studying experimentally include:

- ***Does a deliberative process increase informed decision-making, social trust, or consensus on a contested topic?***
- Link to forum post summary **here**
- Link to forum post summary [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/when-is-deliberation-useful-for-optimism-governance/9142)
- Link to full academic paper (coming soon!)
- ***Does a sample of guest voters allocate resources differently than web-of-trust voters? What is the relationship between social graph connections, vote clustering, and survey data on self-dealing and collusion?***
- Analysis and intervention underway — see forum post on R5 [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-5-expert-voting-experiment/8613) and R6 [here](https://gov.optimism.io/t/retro-funding-6-announcing-guest-voter-participation/8816/3)
Expand Down
Loading