Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove some unused memory management code in the adapter #398

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

elliottt
Copy link
Contributor

@elliottt elliottt commented Jun 28, 2024

After #394 there were some unused functions in the adapter that didn't fail in
CI as we don't currently build the adapter in CI. This PR removes the unused
code, and also builds the adapter in CI.

@elliottt elliottt force-pushed the trevor/remove-unused-adapter-code branch from 455288a to ba3a765 Compare June 28, 2024 20:44
@elliottt elliottt marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 20:45
jameysharp
jameysharp previously approved these changes Jun 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jameysharp jameysharp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because rustc has introduced new warnings from time to time, I'm always hesitant about introducing blanket deny(warnings) as it can mean that upgrading rustc breaks the build. I'm not sure whether to consider that a significant issue here; up to you!

Otherwise, this is clearly sensible. Ship it!

@elliottt elliottt merged commit b12dbfb into main Jun 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@elliottt elliottt deleted the trevor/remove-unused-adapter-code branch June 28, 2024 21:48
GeeWee pushed a commit to GeeWee/Viceroy that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
After fastly#394 there were some unused functions in the adapter that didn't fail in
CI as we don't currently build the adapter in CI. This PR removes the unused
code, and also builds the adapter in CI.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants