-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SG 4.0.33 & PS 2.0.25 #594
Conversation
to get outout to stderr and stdout
Hey @CarlosHorro please add this here: #584 I also would prefer to have a version fixing compomics/peptide-shaker#445 as well. To me it seems that PS does not work at all due to this (or am I wrong?) and then there is not much use in updating SG since both tools are coupled, or? |
A test using MM would also be cool. |
# Conflicts: # tools/peptideshaker/macros_basic.xml
Yes, thank you, I forgot about it...
Well, I might be forgetting something but as far as I know saying that "PS does not work at all" sounds a bit excessive?
I might add it, but that would require to add mzml files to the repo as input to MM and they are usually too big to be included there... Greetings, |
Well, now I see what you meant when you said that PS did not work at all. But paths.txt related stuff has not been touched for a long time and PS worked, so PS current failed tests should be related to another issue... I will try to dig into this as soon as possible, although now there are many holidays coming here in Norway :-) Greetings, |
If this is a non critical error we could |
We might borrow one from here: #587 Is MM not working with mgf files? Then mgf input to |
…n flow, as it happens when PS firstly tries to write the paths.txt file into a shared folder; so, the process should not automatically be considered as failed.
MetaMorpheus only admits mzml files, yes. I thought about adding a warning text message in the peak_lists_files area, and I am not sure if a validation may be added... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one last question: is it correct that exec_dir is not used anymore for PS?
Can you respond to #553? |
Thank you for the reminder, I did not see her question on time. |
Um... that is a good question, I think that using the temporary folder works fine, but now I am not sure about , ie, this searchgui.py code in bioconda :
The piece of code related to xtandem is not being executed anymore, but it seems to work fine (I guess the path existed)... |
About the validator, do you think it is possible to do it @bernt-matthias ? I have done some research and I do not find anything related to a validator that checks the value of 2 different parameters (in this case, the search engines chosen and the file formats introduced) ? |
Wondering if this could "solve" the paths.txt exception problem since the copy should be writable. But I would prefer if it works without exec_dir .. |
You were right, with the "exec_dir" the paths.txt issue does not show up. What do I do? I am afraid that my time for keeping the tools will not be enough for solving that paths.txt related issue without the exec_dir soon at all... |
I would suggest to try to go the |
Really looking forward that my colleagues can test metamorpheus from SG (they are currently also trying #587). |
I will try to add the MetaMorpheus test today... do I add any comment about the source of the mzML & fasta files for the test, @bernt-matthias ? |
yes. why not |
I think this should make it... |
Thanks @CarlosHorro |
Metamorpheus available
Other bugfixes