Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(gtfs/schedule/spec): add missing Foreign specifiers #479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

firestack
Copy link
Contributor

It seems like these new fields were added but were not consistent with the rest of the document, this fixes those type fields to match with other foreign ID fields.

It seems like these new fields were added but were not consistant with the rest of the document, this fixes those type fields to match with other foreign ID fields.
@eliasmbd eliasmbd added Change: Editorial Inconsequential changes to the specification such as link updates, grammatical errors, formatting. GTFS Schedule Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Schedule Support: Needs Review Needs support to review proposal. labels Jun 27, 2024
@eliasmbd
Copy link
Collaborator

@firestack Thanks for bringing this up! Contributions like these help us improve the overall quality of the spec. The community will get back to you and review your proposed changes soon.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tzujenchanmbd tzujenchanmbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again @firestack for catching this!

(Simple editorial changes - no need to vote)

@tzujenchanmbd tzujenchanmbd merged commit 95178e4 into google:master Jul 2, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Change: Editorial Inconsequential changes to the specification such as link updates, grammatical errors, formatting. GTFS Schedule Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Schedule Support: Needs Review Needs support to review proposal.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants