-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Displaying link to metamask page on install #7
Open
dafuga
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
displaying-link-to-metamask-page
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7ffd33d
enhancement: displaying link to metamask page on install
dafuga 795ed6a
cleanup: removed log statement
dafuga c4e8422
chore: updated shasum
dafuga a77c187
chore: renaming snap to EOS Wallet
dafuga cda81ce
chore: updated hash
dafuga 1152ed5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into displaying-link-to-…
dafuga File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This needs to be "EOS Wallet" I believe.
While the plugin itself is generally Antelope-compatible, the release I think we will do is EOS-focused, and to line up with the other Snaps, we can just call them "CHAIN Wallet".
I'm not sure if there are other places in the app that call it an "Antelope" product, but if there are - if we could make them all reference this variable (to easily rename the release), that'd be awesome
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renamed the snap 👍 The other place where
Antelope
is used is in the package name which is currently@greymass/antelope-snap
. I guess that should be@greymass/eos-snap
as we'll probably need a different repo for each chain? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, makes sense. I renamed the repo to:
https://github.com/greymass/eos-wallet-snap
Yeah we may need a repo for each chain. Unsure of what the best structure is. We could:
That last option could be the best? It would let us pull changes from upstream (the Antelope repo) into each chain repo, as changes become available.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I agree that using branches may be the easiest. If we go that route then should we rename the repo to @greymass/antelope-snap?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The one argument I can think of for using forks instead of branches would be more fine grained permissions, like if we wanted to be able to allow specific collaborators from specific chains.
Another argument might be around CI/CD, if we want to go that route 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They have to be different packages no matter what we do. Did you mean different repositories?
It also might be just as confusing to them to have one repo with different branches 😓
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah sorry, I meant repositories. I think that sticking with the single repository that was already audited will be simpler than trying to submit a fork of a repository that was audited.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I'm not against submitting a fork and seeing if it works though. I could be overthinking this 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In any case, we agree that we should rename this repo to
greymass/antelope-snap
? From there, we could either create a new branch or fork for each new network wallet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'll rename it back to what it was - and we can create a branch.
The audit also specifically says
greymass/antelope-snap
, and even renaming it might cause some confusion.The package we release however should be named
eos-wallet
(or similar) when we publish to NPM/etc.