-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
error parsing BAM long-ranger aligned files #8
Comments
I've seen this once before internally, but hadn't followed up. I'm not sure how to interpret that SA tag. I just opened an issue with the 10x folks on their aligner repository and hopefully will get an answer on this point. |
this simple patch seems to work-around the problem it, not sure if it is a proper solutin:
|
Yes, that will allow you to proceed and I would probably do something similar if that's how they're supposed to be interpreted. A position of 0 in 1-based coordinates indicates an unmapped alignment though and I don't think that will be properly handled currently. It also begs the question whether all Lariat SA tags are reporting 0-based coordinates instead of 1-based coordinates... |
Just an update on this, I did receive acknowledgement from 10x that they'd seen my report and look into it, but no additional information thus far. |
I've heard back from 10X.
I've pushed a potential fix to the |
@mcieslik-mctp - I've done some unit-testing and speed testing on the patch and it seems ok. I'm waiting to hear back from @kmsteinberg for some internal testing before releasing. If you want to give it a try as well, I'd be grateful for any feedback in advance of a release. |
When running
extract-sv-reads
on a long-ranger aligned BAM file, the program quits immediately with the following message:It appears that this matches the SAM SA tag spec's, although the -1 pos looks suspicious.
The same file aligned with BWA-MEM causes no problems, so it may be considered actually a bug in long-ranger....
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: