ci: change to using solo-charts repo and solo-containers repo

[JeffreyDallas]

Description

This pull request changes the following:

• Pointing to new chart repo
• Rebrand any fst reference to solo

Related Issues

• Closes switch to solo-charts and solo-containers #647

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   29s ⏱️ +2s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a35f342. ± Comparison against base commit be3fb6b.

This pull request removes 2 and adds 2 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine FST chart values [profile = test] ‑ ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine FST chart values [profile = test]
ProfileManager prepareValuesForFstChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file ‑ ProfileManager prepareValuesForFstChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file

ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine Solo chart values [profile = test] ‑ ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine Solo chart values [profile = test]
ProfileManager prepareValuesForSoloChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file ‑ ProfileManager prepareValuesForSoloChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   59s ⏱️ +3s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a35f342. ± Comparison against base commit be3fb6b.

This pull request removes 2 and adds 2 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine FST chart values [profile = test] ‑ ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine FST chart values [profile = test]
ProfileManager prepareValuesForFstChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file ‑ ProfileManager prepareValuesForFstChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file

ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine Solo chart values [profile = test] ‑ ProfileManager determine chart values for a profile should determine Solo chart values [profile = test]
ProfileManager prepareValuesForSoloChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file ‑ ProfileManager prepareValuesForSoloChart should set the value of a key to the contents of a file

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2E Test Report

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 0dbc8bb.

[github-actions]

E2E Test Report

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit a35f342.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for be3fb6b1	✅ 86.54%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (be3fb6b)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (a35f342)	4237	3379	79.75%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#648)	52	45	86.54%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.45455% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.54%. Comparing base (1761455) to head (a35f342).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/commands/network.mjs	75.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/commands/cluster.mjs	80.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
test/e2e/e2e_node_util.js	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
test/test_util.js	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #648      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.52%   79.54%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        5069     5069              
  Branches      705      705              
==========================================
+ Hits         4031     4032       +1     
+ Misses       1037     1036       -1     
  Partials        1        1              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/commands/account.mjs	68.62% <100.00%> (ø)
src/commands/flags.mjs	96.10% <100.00%> (ø)
src/commands/init.mjs	80.35% <ø> (ø)
src/commands/mirror_node.mjs	66.66% <ø> (ø)
src/commands/node.mjs	74.57% <ø> (ø)
src/commands/node/tasks.mjs	91.33% <ø> (ø)
src/commands/prompts.mjs	63.01% <100.00%> (ø)
src/commands/relay.mjs	73.68% <100.00%> (ø)
src/core/account_manager.mjs	80.73% <100.00%> (ø)
src/core/constants.mjs	94.38% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 9 more