Decorators and forwarding, call/apply

[nazarepiedady]

I did the possible to translate the better I could, if there is any grammar errors and I'll seek time to make right corrections to it.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[odsantos]

Hi @nazarepiedady ,

Here is a partial review.

The comments and 'it' strings in the folder '1-js\06-advanced-functions\09-call-apply-decorators\01-spy-decorator_js.view' seem that were not translated.

The same for '1-js\06-advanced-functions\09-call-apply-decorators\02-delay_js.view\test.js', '1-js\06-advanced-functions\09-call-apply-decorators\03-debounce_js.view\test.js', and 1-js\06-advanced-functions\09-call-apply-decorators\03-debounce\debounce.view\index.html, except one-words like "delay", "test", 'a', and 'debounce' on _js.view or function names.

The article review is still missing, and hopefully shall be done at the earliest opportunity.

Thank you.

[javascript-translate-bot]

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

[odsantos]

Hi @nazarepiedady , here is the article review as well.

I look forward to reviewing the files which still need to be translated under this main folder.

Thank you.

[javascript-translate-bot]

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

[nazarepiedady]

/done

[nazarepiedady]

@odsantos, I finally updated this pull request, so I think we can go ahead to review it to start to translate others as soon as possible.

[nazarepiedady]

@jonnathan-ls, @Peruibeloko, do you have time to review it?
To me, it seems the most clear translated that I already reviewed in this project.
I am open to correct the grammatical mistakes and improve the comprehension, but I am close to sacrifice the Portuguese language just to please people that do not have any interest to learn what they do not know.

[Peruibeloko]

Suggested change

	Pós-escrito: Este decorador é algumas vezes útil para testes unitários. Sua forma avançada é `sinon.spy` na biblioteca [Sinon.JS](http://sinonjs.org).
	P.S. Esse decorador pode eventualmente ser útil para testes unitários. Sua forma avançada é `sinon.spy` na biblioteca [Sinon.JS](http://sinonjs.org).

[Peruibeloko]

Fique a vontade para manter o "Pós-escrito" :)

[nazarepiedady]

@Peruibeloko, I need to keep it because it helps increase the comprehension of the content.

[Peruibeloko]

Suggested change

	Nota como é utilizada aqui uma função de seta (ou função anónima). Como sabemos, as funções de seta não possuem `this` e `arguments` próprios, então `f.apply(this, arguments)` recebe o `this` e `arguments` da função envolvente.
	Note como é utilizada aqui uma função de seta. Como sabemos, as funções de seta não possuem `this` e `arguments` próprios, então `f.apply(this, arguments)` recebe o `this` e `arguments` da função envolvente.

Funções de seta e funções anônimas não são conceitos equivalentes, funções de seta podem ser nomeadas e funções anônimas podem ser declaradas usando function

[nazarepiedady]

@Peruibeloko, I think you are not remembering that anonymous functions could be named.

To illustrate what I want to tell, consider this humble example below:

let getName = function(name) { return name }
console.log(`${getName('Marcos')} was called by ${getName.name} function`)

getName = (name) => name
console.log(`${getName('Marcos')} was called by ${getName.name} function`)

I recommend you to try to run the code above to see what I am talking about.

[Peruibeloko]

@nazarepiedady On your example, neither function is anonymous:

• The first one creates an anonymous function, which then gets named as getName1
• The second one creates a named arrow function called getName2.

An anonymous function is, by definition, a function without a name.

A better example would be:

// Anonymous function expression
console.log((function() {}).name)

// Named function declaration
console.log((function namedDeclaration() {}).name)

// Anonymous arrow function
console.log((() => {}).name)

// Named arrow function
const namedArrow = () => {}
console.log(namedArrow.name)

Which correctly prints out:

[nazarepiedady]

@Peruibeloko, You are absolutely correct, I was not remembered about this approach.

[javascript-translate-bot]

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

[nazarepiedady]

/done

[nazarepiedady]

@Peruibeloko, could you review how things are now?

[Peruibeloko]

@nazarepiedady I left a comment explaining my suggestion a little better, but the changes look ok!

[javascript-translate-bot]

Thank you 💖 I updated the Progress Issue #1 🎉 🎉 🎉